Tag Archives: welfare budget

IDS was talking openly about restricting Child Benefit to two children, so how can the Conservatives deny Danny Alexander’s claims?

Danny Alexander has claimed that the Tories would meet their target of cutting £12 billion to the welfare budget by  making massive cuts to Child Benefit, means testing, limiting it to two children, abolishing the increased payment for the first child and removing it for 16-19 year olds. He told the Guardian that they had suggested these things back in 2012 and the Liberal Democrats had put a stop to them:

The Conservatives have been under sustained pressure to detail how they will cut £12bn from the welfare budget by 2017-2018, and the Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank confirmed this week the Tories have so far disclosed only 10% of these cut in the form of a two-year freeze in working age benefits.

A separate internal government paper, Alexander reveals, was drawn up by the Treasury commissioned by the Tories for an additional £6bn cuts in welfare to be announced in the 2012 Autumn Statement.

The £8bn worth of welfare cuts were drawn up by Duncan Smith at a time when the cabinet was considering whether to stick to its timetable to reduce Britain’s national debt as a proportion of GDP. The plan was dropped.

The Tories have come out with a mockraged “But how could he suggest such a thing?” denial. This is barely credible. We know that Iain Duncan Smith was talking openly about limiting Child Benefit to two children back in 2013 as was Grant Shapps who added an even nastier element to this policy – that it should only apply to unemployed parents. According to the Telegraph, then:

But instead of denying the payments to all large families, some Tories have suggested that restrictions should be applied only to parents who do not work.

Grant Shapps, the Conservative chairman, earlier this year suggested that unemployed parents should not receive child benefit for additional children.

Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, last year questioned whether it was acceptable that families on benefits should continue to receive endless amounts of money for every child they have, when parents who are working often cannot afford to have more children.

The Lib Dems have insisted that there should be no more welfare cuts imposed during this Parliament.

As recently as last month, Newsnight reported that the Tories were wanting to restrict payment to three children, with Dominic Raab muttering darkly about “personal responsibility.”

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 65 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 20th Jul - 3:13pm
    @Yeovil Yokel The answer, my friend, was absolutely NOWHERE. Methinks it’s not only time to reform local government structure and finance but voting rules as...
  • User AvatarYeovil Yokel 20th Jul - 2:42pm
    (By the way, John Marriott, how did you fare when you contacted your local Returning Officer about the Independent canvassing INSIDE your local polling station...
  • User AvatarYeovil Yokel 20th Jul - 2:30pm
    I agree with Richard & Dennis, manned space exploration is a terrible misuse of precious resources and is not a good way to sort out...
  • User AvatarDennis Wake 20th Jul - 2:11pm
    John Peters: I am fully aware that carbon dioxide is converted to oxygen and that the Earth's climate has been changing forever but we did...
  • User AvatarSue Sutherland 20th Jul - 1:45pm
    I’m so glad that Jane Dodds is passionate about poverty and I have donated to her campaign. I wish I could do more and it’s...
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 20th Jul - 1:16pm
    Innocent bystander, the FRC code is designed to provide flexibility and allow public companies to determine themselves how they will incorporate stakeholder engagement in their...