Tag Archives: winston mckenzie

Sal Brinton

Sal Brinton writes… Ukip’s hypocrisy on tackling serious child abuse issue is breath-taking

By Sal Brinton | Tue 28th October 2014 - 8:00 pm

UKIP logoToday in the House of Lords, Baroness Joan Walmsley and the Lib Dems secured an agreement from the Government on the Serious Crime Bill, for a major consultation on introducing rules on mandatory reporting of child abuse.

At our recent Federal Conference in Glasgow, Liberal Democrats passed new Party policy in support of requiring those who work with children and vulnerable adults to be required by law to report to the authorities if they have any suspicion that abuse is taking place. However, despite debates on this and other amendments concerning child abuse being debates, Ukip members of the House of Lords failed again to participate in this work.

Ukip’s hypocrisy is breath-taking. They issue a photograph of a girl with the headline ‘There are 1400 reasons why you should not trust Labour again’ in Rotherham, but their record on tackling serious child abuse issue is disgraceful.

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , , and | 17 Comments
Baroness Sarah Ludford MEP

Lord Pearson as a Tory party whip and Griffin v. Maloney

By Baroness Sarah Ludford MEP | Wed 9th December 2009 - 4:13 pm

UKIP have got themselves into a right pickle recently, poor things! It emerged last week that their new leader Lord Pearson a number of months ago made a somewhat controversial offer to the Conservative party. Pearson allegedly (The Times, 30 November, UKIP’s planned deal with Tories causes outrage in anti-Europe party) approached Lord Strathclyde, the leader of the Tories in the House of Lords, with an offer to disband the party and withdraw all UKIP candidates if the Tories agreed to hold a referendum on EU membership. Lord Strathclyde himself has confirmed that the meeting with Pearson, who is in fact a former Tory, took place.

Although Nigel Farage has since changed the story slightly saying that the offer only included withdrawing all candidates, this is still a pretty hefty political gamble.

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , , , , , , and | 15 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jason Connor
    Yes that's why the triple lock should be retained....
  • Jana
    “Pensioners deserve that respect, as do younger people who will help fund the system and may one day depend on it.” Yes, just as current pensioners funde...
  • Nigel Orchard
    I welcome the announcement of this Review, particularly its proposed examination of the fairness, timeliness and consistency of the Party's complaints and disci...
  • Jana
    “ our Federal party Constitution makes clear that, as a party, we reject all discrimination and prejudice based on religion or belief and that we respect the ...
  • Chris Nicholson
    I am not sure where Theakes gets his information but Lambeth Lib Dems are not in cahorts ( or cahoots) with the Greens. We are not in coalition with the Greens ...