Tag Archives: lord strathclyde

“Delivering this is going to be very difficult” – Tory peer Strathclyde’s verdict on Lords reform

Let’s start with the good news — Lord Strathclyde, the Tory leader in the Lords is a self-styled “long-term supporter” of reform of the Upper House. Now for the bad news — he’s pessimistic that the Coalition will actualy deliver elected senators by 2015, the deadline set by deputy prime minister Nick Clegg.

Here’s what m’Lord Strathclyde (who inherited a seat from his grandfather at the age of 25) has to say in an interview in today’s Financial Times:

“To me the dream scenario would be . . . getting in place by the end of the next session and then going forward

Posted in News and Parliament | Also tagged , , , , and | 7 Comments

Lord Pearson as a Tory party whip and Griffin v. Maloney

UKIP have got themselves into a right pickle recently, poor things! It emerged last week that their new leader Lord Pearson a number of months ago made a somewhat controversial offer to the Conservative party. Pearson allegedly (The Times, 30 November, UKIP’s planned deal with Tories causes outrage in anti-Europe party) approached Lord Strathclyde, the leader of the Tories in the House of Lords, with an offer to disband the party and withdraw all UKIP candidates if the Tories agreed to hold a referendum on EU membership. Lord Strathclyde himself has confirmed that the meeting with Pearson, who is in fact a former Tory, took place.

Although Nigel Farage has since changed the story slightly saying that the offer only included withdrawing all candidates, this is still a pretty hefty political gamble.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , , , , , , and | 15 Comments

Would the Tories kick Lord Belize Ashcroft out of the Upper Chamber?

Over at the Mirror’s Kevin Maguire & Friends blog, Jason Beattie asks if the Tories are on the point of reversing their U-turn, and supporting a Lib Dem motion obliging anyone who sits in the House of Lords to be a UK resident for tax purposes:

This may seem like an obscure requirement but it could mean Lord Laidlaw (a Tory) Lord Paul (Labour) and possibly Lord Ashcroft (a Tory who has never come clean about where he pays his taxes) face being kicked out of the Upper House. When this bill was first introduced by the Lib Dem Lord

Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , and | Leave a comment
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid M 17th Sep - 2:22am
    As a Housing Association tenant not subject to S21 I fully support this. It may well be that post S21 the grounds bssed eviction clauses...
  • User AvatarRoss McLean 17th Sep - 12:34am
    Jayne - I'm sure you are familiar with the preamble to our constitution. Those are our values and principles, just as they always were. What...
  • User Avatarfrankie 17th Sep - 12:19am
    What is Fiat Money? Fiat money is government-issued currency that is not backed by a physical commodity, such as gold or silver, but rather by...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 16th Sep - 11:36pm
    Would we have seen such a duet when Glee Club sang ' Tony Blair can F-ck off and Die? It seems that the Liberal Democrats...
  • User AvatarRodney Watts 16th Sep - 11:13pm
    @ Peter Martin Yes, some do try to conflate the two but anti-zionism is NOT antisemitism as explained in the video by Prof. Illan Pappe,...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 16th Sep - 11:13pm
    Antisemitism is a wart on the face of humanity. I am with my Labour Party Supporting (alleged self- hating) Jewish friends. That politicians have used...
Thu 10th Oct 2019