Tag Archives: lord strathclyde

“Delivering this is going to be very difficult” – Tory peer Strathclyde’s verdict on Lords reform

Let’s start with the good news — Lord Strathclyde, the Tory leader in the Lords is a self-styled “long-term supporter” of reform of the Upper House. Now for the bad news — he’s pessimistic that the Coalition will actualy deliver elected senators by 2015, the deadline set by deputy prime minister Nick Clegg.

Here’s what m’Lord Strathclyde (who inherited a seat from his grandfather at the age of 25) has to say in an interview in today’s Financial Times:

“To me the dream scenario would be . . . getting in place by the end of the next session and then going forward

Posted in News and Parliament | Also tagged , , , , and | 7 Comments

Lord Pearson as a Tory party whip and Griffin v. Maloney

UKIP have got themselves into a right pickle recently, poor things! It emerged last week that their new leader Lord Pearson a number of months ago made a somewhat controversial offer to the Conservative party. Pearson allegedly (The Times, 30 November, UKIP’s planned deal with Tories causes outrage in anti-Europe party) approached Lord Strathclyde, the leader of the Tories in the House of Lords, with an offer to disband the party and withdraw all UKIP candidates if the Tories agreed to hold a referendum on EU membership. Lord Strathclyde himself has confirmed that the meeting with Pearson, who is in fact a former Tory, took place.

Although Nigel Farage has since changed the story slightly saying that the offer only included withdrawing all candidates, this is still a pretty hefty political gamble.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , , , , , , and | 15 Comments

Would the Tories kick Lord Belize Ashcroft out of the Upper Chamber?

Over at the Mirror’s Kevin Maguire & Friends blog, Jason Beattie asks if the Tories are on the point of reversing their U-turn, and supporting a Lib Dem motion obliging anyone who sits in the House of Lords to be a UK resident for tax purposes:

This may seem like an obscure requirement but it could mean Lord Laidlaw (a Tory) Lord Paul (Labour) and possibly Lord Ashcroft (a Tory who has never come clean about where he pays his taxes) face being kicked out of the Upper House. When this bill was first introduced by the Lib Dem Lord

Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , and | Leave a comment
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarfrankie 29th Jan - 7:49am
    Barry, Events dear boy events. By the next GE the overiding discussion will be the scarcity of unicorns, the lack of faries to staff the...
  • User AvatarMack 29th Jan - 7:45am
    If this poll is legitimate, it likely amounts to a question of familiarity more than anything else. Take it with a pinch of salt. Ed...
  • User AvatarDan M-B 28th Jan - 11:24pm
    I was polled. The question was: "Imagine that these were the only three candidates, but Layla Moran and Daisy Cooper weren't competitive. In this scenario,...
  • User AvatarHywel 28th Jan - 11:23pm
    "it was under Nick Clegg’s watch that we managed not only to fail to win several seats from Labour that should have been easy wins...
  • User AvatarYousuf Farah 28th Jan - 11:00pm
    Since the UK is leaving the EU, decoupling and isolating, as someone else eloquently put it in this thread, would it not make sense to...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 28th Jan - 10:58pm
    Peter Martin It’s all nonsense of course. In any case, what makes you think Lib Dems are in any position to lecture anyone on “cosy...