Temporary reprieve for funds for disabled election candidates

Last month, David Buxton wrote about how the Government’s freezing of the Access to Elected Office Fund meant that he simply couldn’t stand in the 2017 General Election:

For the 2015 General Election, I obtained a grant of £40,000 from the Access to Elected Office Fund, which I used to participate in the Liberal Democrat candidate-selection process. But I could not have participated without the Fund’s support.

And​, last year,​ I was effectively barred from standing in the 2017 General Election because of the absence of the Fund.Many o​ther deaf and disabled candidates from ​the Lib Dems and from ​other parties ​are affected too, ​including Emily Brothers from Labour who is blind, ​and Simeon Hart for the Greens who is deaf, both of whom feature in the More United campaign​.​

The Access to Elected Office Fund used to help deaf and disabled people from all political parties, to stand for election, at any level. It ran from 2012-2015, and was intended to create a level playing field, given the additional costs that disabled people can incur when standing for election.

British Sign Language Interpreters, assistive technology for blind people and mobility transport all cost money. But the Fund was frozen, put “under review”, in 2015.

That review has not been conducted or completed, and the Fund has not been re-opened. The Fund has now been closed for longer than it was open so we are calling on the Government to restore it with immediate effect.

More United ran a campaign to restore the fund and Lib Dem MPs, including Christine Jardine and Stephen Lloyd, wrote to the Government to tell them of the importance of supporting disabled candidates.

This week, they won a legal challenge and secured the fund for the 2019 elections.

Clearly there is more work to be done to secure the long term future of this fund, but this is a very welcome step. Parliaments, town halls and governments make better decisions when they look like the population they seek to represent. We have to fight for this fund to be fully restored.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJeff 20th Jan - 11:23pm
    Chris Cory 20th Jan '20 - 6:45pm: No alignment, and therefore there will have to be a border between N. Ireland and the republic, or...
  • User AvatarDavid Becket 20th Jan - 10:22pm
    3 posts looking at Gender Balance, 3 Posts looking at Racial Diversity. As others have said nothing outward looking, nothing on major issues like climate...
  • User AvatarHywel 20th Jan - 9:59pm
    For most of the time I was a party member some wing or another was saying that just around the corner was some split in...
  • User AvatarJeff 20th Jan - 9:48pm
    Andrew 20th Jan '20 - 9:05pm: I was assuming membership of the EU or at least the customs union and single market in my original...
  • User AvatarTonyH 20th Jan - 9:41pm
    I'm totally with John and Ian on this. I too have served my time on party committees over the years, often discussing these kind of...
  • User AvatarDavid Warren 20th Jan - 9:23pm
    @PaulBarker Thank you for understanding the context that the S word was used in the article. In my time in the Labour and trade union...