The Ashcroft affair: it’s not just about money, it’s about the civil service

What has slowly been dragged out of the Conservative Party over the last day is that senior figures such as William Hague and David Cameron were kept in the dark over the exact facts of Lord Ashcroft’s financial affairs for many years. Despite seeking reassurances and the like – and answering questions about it in public – none of them actually got to the bottom of the matter.

Leaving aside the rights and wrongs of the Ashcroft affair itself for a moment (many of which amount to the simple question, “Is something being legal enough to make it acceptable?”), what does this tell you about how Cameron, Hague et al might handle the civil service if they were in power?

The message sent out to civil servants seems quite clear: drag your feet, don’t fess up the full information and it’s ok – they won’t keep on asking questions until they get to the truth of the matter. They’re happy to stop far short of that.

In other words it’d be a field day for the reluctant, the incompetent or the just plain lazy to get away with carrying on as before regardless. Of course, there are many, many civil servants who are far better than that, but that’s the easy part of running government. The tough part is getting the best out of those who aren’t.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • I think we have got our approach to Ashcroft wrong (and who let Shirley Williams on QQT last night? She was poor on this topic).

    Crtiticising non-dom donations is not a good idea if you accept non-dom donations (Chris Huhne).

    The real issue here is about large donations full stop (and Labour are just as culpable on this matter), and the influence that individuals can gain in this way. It is just made worse by being channelled through tax-avoiding countries.

    Donations should be reformed to a low level (say £5k) and ONLY t be made by individuals elegible to vote in UK parliamentary elections; NOT companies, or Unions.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Raw 5th Jul - 10:02am
    As a former Convenor (Cabinet member) for Social Care in Scotland, I must say how refreshing it is to hear from somebody as well qualified,...
  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 5th Jul - 9:43am
    @Peter Martin The reason I asked you to come up with arguments as to why people disagree with you is because I'm trying to work...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 5th Jul - 9:39am
    "Reduce the number of people in poverty by 25%". Why 25%, or 24%, or 26% ? Don't the other 75% matter ?
  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 5th Jul - 9:27am
    @Peter Kenny I wonder if you're responding to the headline, rather than the article. Did you register that the title talks about the hard left,...
  • User AvatarJohn Pugh 5th Jul - 9:02am
    Sharp observers here have picked up on the power of patronage as a device to control dissent when things were going wrong. I used to...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 5th Jul - 8:08am
    "Reduce the number of people in poverty by 25%.. " Maybe the Lib Dem constitution should also read "At least 25% fewer people shall be...