Here’s the verdict of The Economist’s columnist on British politics, the pseudonymous Bagehot:
In some ways, miraculous to report, the Liberal Democrats have the most mature position on the deficit. Nick Clegg, their leader, this week demoted some of the party’s spending pledges (for example, on pensions and university funding) to aspirations, pre-emptively narrowing his manifesto to a few, affordable core themes. He has not promised to protect any departmental budgets. Vince Cable, his Treasury spokesman, has a longer list of items for the chop than Mr Osborne, including some cherished defence projects, but accepts that the axeman’s hand should be stayed for another year.
There is a sting in the tail:
Sadly, the chaotic announcement of one of the Lib Dems’ main revenue-raising measures—a new “mansions tax”, first directed at homes worth more than £1m, a threshold later doubled—hardly inspired confidence.
Which is harsh, but not totally unfair.
The Tories meanwhile come in for a battering from the Economist. Just as Tory shadow chancellor George Osborne gears up to cut budgets as soon as June, Bagehot accuses the party of being “hasty as well as timid”:
One explicit difference between Mr Brown’s plans and Mr Cameron’s is that the latter wants to start cutting this year, despite the risk of stalling the crawl out of recession. In that, he is probably mistaken, just as he was wrong to oppose Mr Brown’s fiscal stimulus. In both cases, the Tories may have subordinated sensible economic thinking to political positioning.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Council to help people 'correctly identify' potholes
'Over me beat the invisible wings'- Ireland, Churchill and Lloyd George
How many councillors has Reform UK lost since the May 2026 elections?
Government must do more to help people onto the housing ladder
Peter Davies
Tristan Ward
Pawel Urbanski
David Moon
2 Comments
Since the Economist supported “light touch” regulation that led to the economic mess we are in today, I do not think winning approval from them is anything to be proud of.
Far too much fuss is made about the mansion tax which was a relatively modest proposal.
They are correct however in siding with us and against the Tories who want to make cuts straight away, making a double dip recession more likely.
How sad that people seem to refuse to take endorsement for the party, just because of some other differences. Bagehot is one of the most incisive commentators on British poltics, writing in a publication with a circulation of over 1m (albeit half from America).
For anyone who actually reads the Economist, will know that it has been one of the most pragmatic and sensible in terying to address the crisis, and does support re-regulation, up to a point, of the financial market.
Anyway – great news, and recognition!