The geopolitics of COVID-19: Can liberalism win the day?

Embed from Getty Images

The pandemic is an unprecedented global challenge affecting all humanity, which is suffering the consequences at very considerable social and economic cost.

The world was already in disorder before COVID-19 made its appearance but the crisis has undoubtedly deepened the great power rivalry between China and the U.S., aggravated by a far-reaching trade war starting sometime before the pandemic hit.

Trust in international systems of cooperation have been impacted. Although coordination is better right now, and concrete initiatives are underway to try and ensure that the eventual vaccine is a global public good for health, the scramble between countries to be first to have their populations vaccinated will sorely test the world’s ability to cooperate together again.

COVID-19 has also been an opportunity for some governments to crack down on freedoms. Countries with little respect for human rights have been taking advantage of the world attention’s focus on the COVID-19 to clamp down more strongly on human rights defenders, minorities and other elements they consider undesirable. On the one hand, anti-government political protests petered out in places like New Delhi, Hong Kong and Thailand because of dangers associated with large crowds spreading the virus more easily. But now, the lockdown and confinement has also resulted in increased radicalisation of societies, with an upsurge of violence from the extreme right and extreme left, egged on by forces aiming at further destabilising western societies.

Mainland China has undoubtedly taken advantage of COVID-19 in taking a more aggressive stance towards the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), Taiwan and in the South China Sea – as well as conducting disinformation campaigns, alongside Russia, targeted at western democracies to undermine the resilience of our societies. The tone of Chinese diplomacy has grown remarkably strident and dismissive of western concerns about its actions.

What should the UK’s and EU’s positioning be vis-à-vis an ‘America-First’ United States and authoritarian China? If the unspeakable happens and Trump wins the November 2020 Presidential election, the UK and EU will need to carve out their own distinctive policies and take the lead working even more closely with other remaining likeminded countries to be the defenders of last resort of the multilateral system and the liberal order.

Can the liberal order fight back successfully against rising authoritarian regimes? How can we ensure freedom wins at the end of the day? This is yet another critical moment in history. The Lib Dems, along with fellow liberal parties, worldwide must play their part internationally to help win the day.

* George Cunningham is the Chair of Liberal Democrats Overseas.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

6 Comments

  • john oundle 1st Aug '20 - 12:03am

    ‘ the UK and EU will need to carve out their own distinctive policies and take the lead’

    Not going to happen, as we have seen with Russia & China, Germany always puts trade first.

  • I love the photo.

  • Liberalism can, and it probably offers the best routes with education.
    However liberalising the licensing controls under covid has been a horrible and dangerous disaster for coastal towns and resorts, and city centres, in particular. Countless peaceful towns and villages are fearful in the face of huge numbers of visitors, many attracted by the grab and go ‘takeaway’ alcohol culture covid has produced. No one has asked residents or even councils whether they want this, it just happens and much worse of course goes on undercover of the mingling crowds.

    Why is it okay for coastal towns to have their inhabitants put at risk from large and ‘relaxed’ crowds in a time of pandemic? What do restaurants and bars need to offer all day every day glasses of beer and ‘cockstails’ to go. How is track n trace to work in such an environment?

    Why are we saying nothing??

  • Peter Hirst 1st Aug '20 - 5:13pm

    Covid is giving the global community an opportunity to come together to combat a common threat. I’m sure there will be others though each one ignored makes the next one more of a challenge. Unless world leaders can come to a common understanding of our shared destiny, the future for mankind seems depressing.

  • John Marriott 5th Aug '20 - 9:05am

    No.

  • Peter Watson 5th Aug '20 - 10:16am

    @Peter Hirst “Covid is giving the global community an opportunity to come together to combat a common threat. I’m sure there will be others …”
    The dilemma is that Covid also seems to drive people apart in so many ways: physically because of social distancing; socially and psychologically because of a lack of trust in our neighbours and friends who might be carrying the disease; scientifically as we disagree over how or whether to deal with it; politically and philosophically as we consider degrees of state intervention and control; etc.
    Climate change is an obvious example of a “common threat”, and the global response to Covid raises a lot of the same issues but with a greatly accelerated timescale so perhaps much can be learned.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPaul Barker 11th Aug - 7:29am
    I dont see much point in comparing present Polling with the past, we are not in "Normal" times. Current Politics does have something of a...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 11th Aug - 7:22am
    @ Michael BG, You're just saying that: (S-I) + (M-X) + (T-G) =0, Which is the well known sectoral balance equation. But what makes you...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 11th Aug - 5:20am
    Vince Cable isn't too keen on the idea of a UBI. He says: "My scepticism was fuelled by seeing it advocated with equal fervour both...
  • User AvatarPaul Holmes 11th Aug - 12:27am
    @Marco. The point is though that when we were on 0-6% at the start of Paddy's Leadership it was an unusually low and quite temporary...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 11th Aug - 12:03am
    John Marriott, Canada conducted a UBI trial in the 1970s called Mincome as described in this article https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200624-canadas-forgotten-universal-basic-income-experiment "... for basic income to work on...
  • User Avatarsuzanne fletcher 10th Aug - 11:13pm
    Yes good stuff, after the faff of getting in to watch it. Hope plenty of people do bother though