How The Guardian completely misreported an opinion poll finding

Last Thursday, The Guardian’s G2 section carried this rather surprising claim:

According to Keep Britain Tidy, we write more letters to our elected representatives, locally and in Westminster, about dog fouling than we do about anything else.

I did a bit of a double-take when I read it because, in my time, I’ve both dealt with quite a lot of correspondence from the public to elected representatives, worked closely with people who have dealt with even more correspondence and trained people who have dealt with yet more correspondence. And I’ve never got a hint that this is anywhere close to being true. Sure, dog fouling crops up now and again. But the issue people write about most?

So I thought I’d ask Keep Britain Tidy for the facts behind the story (credit to them for replying fully and in detail), and this is what I discovered.

First, although The Guardian reported this as if it were current information, the poll in question according to Keep Britain Tidy was conducted in 2002.

Second, it wasn’t a survey of what topics people have written about, but rather about what issues they “would or had” complained about. Asking what people might do rather than actually have done often gets you very different answers.

But the real killer is that, third, people were only given a limited range of topics to choose from when answering this question, all of which were to do with local environmental quality.

So another – and more accurate – way of wording it would have been, “According to Keep Britain Tidy, seven years ago we said we might write more letters to our elected representatives, locally and in Westminster, about dog fouling than any other of a small range of other local environmental issues.”

Not nearly as dramatic. But rather more believable. Ooops.

We all make mistakes, but I do wonder how such an obviously implausible claim made its way all the way through to the final version of the story seemingly without anyone thinking to check back to the original source?

PS Given how helpful Keep Britain Tidy were, it seems only fair to repeat the point they made about the issue more generally: 46% of participants wanted the council to keep them informed of any changes to services linked to tackling dog fouling.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News and Polls.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Dave Radcliffe 18th Feb '09 - 9:55am

    Do you think this will make it into the BadScience column in Saturday’s Grauniad?

  • Why read the Guardian anyway? It does us down repeatedly.

  • Thanks for that Mark. When I read that Guardian article I thought it sounded unlikely, but it now all makes sense.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tom Bailey
    Alex Macfie says: "He [Farage], has just seized on one case of supposed “anti-white bias” by the police (the only one available)" So the 3 decades of Brit...
  • Alex Macfie
    @Simon Robinson &c: Please stop pretending Nigel Farage is acting in good faith. He has just seized on one case of supposed "anti-white bias" by the police ...
  • William Wallace
    Simon: Please give us your 'What to do' proposals in a future post. Getting to those who have switched off from conventional politics is difficult - even mo...
  • Alex Macfie
    @Chloe: Well the time Bijan Ebrahimi was arrested instead of his future murderer was on video. It didn't lead to any rioting or "vitue signaling" from what I re...
  • Iain Donaldson
    Thank you to everyone who has engaged with the article. While there are legitimate questions about the details, I remain convinced that a federal structure base...