Banks are jeopardising the prospects of the next generation, discouraging financial responsibility and leaving young people facing the sharp end of the credit crunch. With the Government, they have created a “gilded generation” of pampered and over-protected young people, mired in debt and unable to understand their finances.
The liberal free-market think-tank Reform’s new report, written in conjunction with the Chartered Insurance Institute and published this week, finds that the “IPOD generation” of 18-34 year olds – whom we have described as Insecure, Pressurised, Over-taxed and Debt-ridden – have been failed by the “financial establishment”.
Young people have grown up in a time of easy credit and high consumer expectations. Research by Populus, commissioned for the report, shows that they have substantial debts and minimal savings: the mean debt among 18-34 year olds is around £6,000, and 60 per cent have either no savings or less than £1,000. While the next generation have the ability and technological know-how to understand their position and take action, they are finding themselves hamstrung by an industry determined to service the old and patronise the young.
Banks and financial services are out of touch. They offer advice at a price beyond young people’s reach, and provide outdated products ill-suited to their flexible lives. Banks still focus on catering to a disappearing generation who set up home young and had jobs for life. This has created a lack of trust: our report finds that half of young people rely on friends and family as their main source of financial advice.
The situation is compounded by Government-sponsored regulation. So-called “consumer protection” policies are overprotecting young people into a state of irresponsibility, and heavy regulation of the financial services industry has pushed up the costs of financial advice.
Speaking at the launch of the paper, Julia Goldsworthy MP, Liberal Democrat Communities and Local Government Spokesperson, said that policymakers find it difficult to understand and respond to the “elusive generation”, but that there were things Government could do. An IPOD herself, she sympathised that regulation makes young people feel it is not important to understand financial products.
Ms Goldworthy also explained that it is important to look at regulation from the perspective of the consumer. Insisting on paragraphs of small print at the bottom of credit card bills is pointless if young people don’t understand how their debts actually mount up.
Young people know there is a problem, and they want to do something about it. They have been lulled into a false sense of security, growing up in a time of economic stability and historically low interest rates. The sharp shock of the credit crunch may have jolted them from their slumber, as they are challenged with burgeoning debt and a broken housing ladder.
The IPOD generation have a strong sense of responsibility and a desire to be in control of their finances – the explosion in the use of technology such as internet banking and price-comparison websites demonstrates a keenness to budget and manage their finances. But they are held back by a lack of financial literacy, the uninterested attitude of the financial services sector and excessive regulation.
Continuing this trend will result in a “generation of victims”, untrusting of Government and financial institutions, and lacking the capability to do anything about their predicament. There is an alternative: empowering young people to become a “generation of saviours”. This generation will take control of their own finances. They will demand new products from a reformed financial services industry, and will harness the freedom and information provided by Government to stimulate the economy and create innovative solutions to the crisis.
To save the next generation, Government and the financial services industry must help young people take responsibility and become financially capable.
* Dale Bassett is new media politics executive at Reform. The Reform-CII report Money’s too tight to mention: will the IPOD generation ever trust financial services? is available at Reform’s website, www.reform.co.uk.
4 Comments
I think you present the “substantial debt and minimal savings” thing as a situation created by the pull of easy credit and consumer expectation. There’s also an important push factor.
As house prices have risen faster than salaries over the last fifteen years, rental rates have naturally followed. This means that rent (the average norm for anyone under 34) now takes up a much higher proportion of one’s income. The effects of this are exacerbated if you’re on a low salary (if, for example, you’re in your early 20s and just starting out). The proportion spent on rent can simply bring you back to the breadline – for most people starting out on a London graduate salary, for example, rent and bills absorb literally half their salaries before they’ve even paid for transport. Saving becomes an impossible dream.
A significant pull towards good financial habits has disappeared over the same period. “Saving up for a deposit” sounds like a constructive and exciting thing to do – but the more house prices raced away, the less realistic and logical a goal it became.
So the IPOD generation are being perfectly logical, responding to the circumstances around them, namely (a) high cost of basic living and (b) impossibility of being a homeowner. Financial literacy, which I agree is a problem, might be a weak pull factor towards good financial habits, but it can’t be the only one. The situation won’t improve until house values have deflated.
My initial reaction to this piece was to feel somewhat belittled and patronised; though in the age bracket described I don’t feel a victim of the system and have the sense and upbringing to avoid debt (except for student loans) and to put a modest bit away from my (regrettably) modest income. My second reaction was to agree entirely with what Alix said; as ever the voice of reason – bring on the crash!
The crash will help the IPOD generation, but we all need to recognise more of the “push factors” which have encouraged debt. Tuition fees have helped to persuade graduates that debt is normal, unavoidable, and stigma-free. Andrew Tennant may have had the “upbringing to avoid debt”, but the capitalist world has been working very hard to try to re-educate him! When George W Bush told Americans that the most patriotic thing they could do in response to 9/11 was to keep shopping, he was making the same point.
Debt has driven the consumer boom. We have an advertising industry dedicated to inflating our perceptions of need, linked to a financial industry which has frantically worked to find ways we can all increase our private spending.
The threat, if we do not sustain ever-increasing private spending levels, is business failure and mass unemployment. The threat, if we do sustain our current levels of consumption, is the exhaustion of the Earth’s resources.
It is easier to see the need for change than to find a practical way to achieve it. But the debt crisis could prove to be a golden opportunity in disguise.
We have woken up with a staggering financial hangover, after a long, hard party of conspicuous consumption. Reflation, Keynesian economics, and calls for lower taxes sound suspiciously like hair-of-the-dog remedies. Can anyone find a better, greener cure?
David – with you absolutely on that.
Re. Dales call for reform of the financial services ‘industry’ – please reform it into the ground.
We need real green industry building a sustainable future and making the earth a place we can all live without destroying it please, not these financial parasites. Mortgages and savings OK – the rest of the froth NO.