The Observer endorses the Liberal Democrats

Following on from The Guardian‘s endorsement, The Observer becomes the second newspaper to back the LibDems:

The vital context for this election is the twin crises in our economy and our politics. On both issues most credit accrues to the Liberal Democrats. Their Treasury spokesman Vince Cable was prescient in warning of an unsustainable debt bubble; Nick Clegg pushed for greater openness about expenses long before the scandal erupted.

The Lib Dems have in recent years developed a habit of getting things right. They were first of the big three to embrace environmentalism, first to kick back against the assault on civil liberties, alone in opposing the Iraq war…

There is only one party on the ballot paper that, by its record in the old parliament, its manifesto for the new one and its leader’s performance in the campaign, can claim to represent an agenda for radical, positive change in politics. That party is the Liberal Democrats. There is only one way clearly to endorse that message and that is to vote Liberal Democrat.

You can read the full editorial here.

Meanwhile, the Sunday People has followed up its earlier cogent arguments, based on experience in other countries, in favour of Parliaments where no one party has an overall majority (yes, the Sunday People) by coming out for proportional representation:

If we are to change our old political system it can only be done by introducing a new voting system.

Which is why today The People announces it will be campaigning for proportional representation.

The Independent on Sunday also backs reform and goes one step further in talking about tactical voting:

So today we begin our campaign for a fairer system with a plea: in this election of all elections, the opinion polls, in signalling a hung parliament, suggest a historic opportunity for change that, as Nick Clegg suggests to us today, may not recur for a generation. And that compels us to suggest that readers should consider voting tactically on Thursday.

What do we mean by that? As the Tories are opposed to electoral reform and are ahead in the polls, we are asking voters in 85 key constituencies to vote for the candidate best placed to frustrate David Cameron…

If you are convinced by the Tories, then please give Mr Cameron your considered support. But if you believe that we are on the cusp of a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, then join with us, and vote for the change that really matters. Use your democratic right to enhance the democratic rights of all. Vote for a hung parliament, and a better, fairer, greener Britain may just be ours.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in General Election.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Tony Greaves 2nd May '10 - 11:14am

    Nick Cohen is a rodent. He hates us because we opposed the Iraq war.

    More emphasis on these things during the campaign would have been a good idea. Who decided to sideline them?

    Tony Greaves

  • Andrew Suffield 2nd May '10 - 11:23am

    I don’t know about who, but the central theme of the campaign this time is to look forwards and talk about what can be done. This was a fairly inspired choice, because both Labour and the Tories are campaigning on a basis of how awful things are, and this sets up a clear contrast while making them look identical.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Mick Scholes
    "It is rather similar to World War 2, when neither we nor Nazi Germany used poison gas, because both parties were aware of what it had done in WW1 and both part...
  • Dominic
    I agree with Amin (again!). If anything, having the capability to counter an enemy’s (hypothetical) use of tactical nukes reduces the risk that the enemy woul...
  • Dominic
    Not for the first time, I completely agree with Amin. The choice to end your life should be entirely your own and not impeded because someone else doesn’t lik...
  • Andy Chandler
    @Mohammed Amin Could not agree more. And as I expressed in my own article that I wrote and was released earlier today - we are liberals and us liberals shoul...
  • Lyell Yardarms
    It is an unfashionable opinion but this is where Reform (for example) have a huge advantage over the Liberal Democrats and Greens. Approving, vetting and - y...