The right noises on expenses

At last! A party press release in my inbox that I haven’t already seen on a blog and which doesn’t make me go “fnrrr, suppose so”.

The Liberal Democrats today tabled an Early Day Motion calling for the second home allowance to be abolished for London MPs.

Liberal Democrat Shadow Housing Minister and Brent East MP, Sarah Teather, who tabled the motion, said:

“It is completely unacceptable that London MPs living within commuting distance of Westminster are allowed to claim money for a second home. Thousands of Londoners travel to work in Central London every single day, so why on earth shouldn’t their MPs?”

Well, it’s a start anyway. Many Lib Dems – not least those in high office – have openly expressed their frustration in the past that the party has not developed an internal code on expenses to be adhered to by all parliamentarians.

It’s all the more frustrating because our record on openness and on proportionate use of expenses is a pretty good one. A code of ethics would be for the most part a formal expression of restraint already shown. Lib Dems do not pop up in those tabloidesque “I-thought-she-was-my-secretary-but-it-turned-out-she-was-my-physiotherapist-and-oops-also-my-sister” shocks all that often.

In this instance, apparently no London Liberal Democrat MP currently claims the second home allowance. Which makes a campaign on it a bit of a no-brainer.

So will we see this welcome development lead to the drafting of an internal parliamentarian code to mirror the campaign? In the case of the second home allowance, any code would be a literal statement of current practice.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohnny McDermott 25th Feb - 10:47pm
    Thanks David. It’s important that we can be honest about that, too. I’m sure there are some of our southern peers that would consider exile...
  • User AvatarJohnny McDermott 25th Feb - 10:39pm
    TCO - I agree, there’s a solid 45% or so that seems pointless to pursue (a third of them the equivalent of the ERG -...
  • User AvatarDan M-B 25th Feb - 10:28pm
    "How do we incorporate a policy like this , in an inner city environment, without invading Into green belt sits for expansion." Build upwards. Most...
  • User AvatarJeff 25th Feb - 10:12pm
    n hunter 25th Feb '20 - 9:15pm: Maybe my houses on stilts (with all other provisions ie sanitation, waste disposal methods) is a future possibility....
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 25th Feb - 9:26pm
    @Rob It works for me.
  • User Avatarn hunter 25th Feb - 9:15pm
    Sir James Bevan chief exec. of environment agency says dredging and environmental precautions are a must. Population growth will put pressure on non flood plain...