To be fair …

I made clear my view on Sunday that the BBC’s Andrew Marr was bang out-of-order to ask Gordon Brown whether he uses prescription drugs seemingly on the basis of nothing more than Internet rumour:

… in making it an issue on the basis of no evidence, Andrew Marr and the BBC have done a real disservice to serious political reporting.

I stand by my assessment. However, I also pointed out that, at the time of writing, no-one from the right-wing blogosphere had taken Mr Marr to task. It’s only fair, therefore, to note that Tory MP Nadine Dorries yesterday broke ranks with the fellow members of her tribe to post a stinging denunciation:

From entirely my own perspective, British TV journalism hit the gutter yesterday, as Marr took a broadcast interview into a place usually inhabited by red top newspapers. … Do we believe that, as three out of five people suffer with mental health problems/depression at some stage during their life, those people should be excluded from holding high office forever? …

Attacking the man in such a personal way, and not at all professionally, took journalism to a new low and eroded what respect is left within society for politicians. It moved us one step further along the road of a society concerned more with image and gossip than substance and fact. It was a very significant and sad moment.

I’m not sure it’s ever been said by a Lib Dem before, but here goes: well done, Nads! You even managed to win a convert, ConservativeHome’s Tim Montgomerie, who tweeted:

I’ve dithered for 24 hours but @NadineDorriesMP has convinced me that Marr was wrong to ask THAT question

I’m disappointed it took Tim – with whom I disagree on pretty much everything, but have always regarded as fundamentally decent – a day to draw the conclusion, but nevertheless it’s a relief to see the Tory tribe is not so in hock to the cult of Guido not to excuse shoddy, tasteless journalism simply because it’s an attack on Gordon Brown.

Also worth quoting is former PoliticsHome, BBC, Express and Mail lobby correspondent, Nick Assinder, who left no-one in any doubt that he thought Andrew Marr was wrong, and pinned the blame firmly on the right-wing blogosphere:

… this entire rumour started with a single post on an obscure blog, and was based on alleged remarks about Brown’s diet from a Downing Street insider which led the blogger to conclude this must be the consequence of his being prescribed powerful anti-depressants. … The story might have stopped there if it had not been for the fact that bloggers – and, in the first instance it was right-wing bloggers like Guido and Iain Dale – ran with it.

Dale, for example, did the old trick of criticising those who were attacking Brown on the basis of his alleged ill-health, stating, if the story was true, the Prime Minister deserved sympathy not ridicule. It ensured the story got another good show in the blogosphere and, inevitably, was then taken up by the mainstream media.

So, here is a classic example of a dark, unsubstantiated rumour about the Prime Minister’s personal life that owes its existence entirely to a single blog. The fact that it fitted the narrative about Brown’s character only ensured it gained even greater exposure. …

No one is suggesting this was a deliberate plot like smeargate. If anything, it shows such coordinated campaigns are unnecessary, a single blog posting can do the trick. None the less, Damian McBride would have been proud.

Ouch. And spot on.

Read more by or more about , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • The trouble is that the right’s denunciation isn’t that such a flimsy story didn’t deserve the publicity.

    Repeately their condemnation is that depression shouldn’t stop someone being PM. In other words, what seems like a generous bit of support for the PM is actually used to reinforce the rumour and give it credence.

  • It may have been shoddy and tasteless, but there’s still no need for him to resign or even apologise. There are better ways of encouraging responsible journalism than rounding on someone who has generally had a fairly respectable career. We still believe in freedom of the press no matter how wrong they are… right?

  • Mark Williams 29th Sep '09 - 1:43pm

    Um not quite. Guido did not run the story until Matthew Norman ran they story in The Independent. Matthew Norman is hardly “right wing blogosphere”.

  • Something about the quality of Andrew Marr’s journalism suggests to me that he wouldn’t ask the question without an inkling as to whether it might be true. General rumours about GB’s behaviour would suggest a certain instability (such as allegations about his regularly violent out burst with his staff…) Whether it’s true or not I think there is a public debate to be had as to whether our de facto commander in chief whose finger hovers over our nuclear arsenal should be in grasp of all their faculties at all time or at least what happens if they are not.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarKeith Legg 9th Dec - 5:37am
    OK, to come back to the original point - I don't think the EVEL rules are necessarily a problem for a Labour / SNP coalition....
  • User Avatarfrankie 8th Dec - 11:30pm
    I often wondered how theologians in the middle ages would obsess about how many Angels could dance on the head on a pin. I laughed...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 8th Dec - 11:30pm
    Joseph, If a person rejects (S – I) + (M – X) = (G – T) then they have rejected C + S + T...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 8th Dec - 9:28pm
    Peter, yes, global assets and the financial value of claims against those assets will of course net to zero. However, we are talking about the...
  • User AvatarAshley 8th Dec - 8:27pm
    Jo has done and excellent job overall in a campaign which has been framed as all about two parties by the media. That is the...
  • User AvatarRoss McLean 8th Dec - 8:13pm
    @Mike Read yes this is definitely true that national polls don't pick up the extent of tactical voting - or intensive campaigning - in individual...
Tue 10th Dec 2019