Vince Cable to crack down on “rogue” directors

License Some rights reserved by eyewashdesign: A. GoldenVince Cable has rogue directors in his sights, announcing plans to stop people who are convicted of commercial crime overseas from being directors of British companies.

The BBC reports:

The business secretary said dishonest directors could cause “huge” harm.

UK criminals can already be banned as directors, and Mr Cable wants the same for those committed overseas.

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) said the measures are due to be tabled in the Parliamentary session which ends in spring 2015.

They would mean “stronger deterrents” and “more robust sanctions” for the “rogue minority”.

Vince said:

These measures will protect the British economy and our reputation as a good and fair place to do business by banning directors who have already been convicted of offences overseas from running British companies,” he said.

Rogue directors can cause a huge amount of harm in terms of large financial losses, unnecessary redundancies and lifelong investments going down the drain.

These measures come after the very busy BIS department has cracked down on payday lenders, increased consumer rights and attempted to tackle high executive pay.

Photo: Some rights reserved by A.Golden

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Rabi Martins 21st Apr '14 - 12:55pm

    This is welcome news
    There is another class of “rogue directors” Vince needs tackle.
    This is the group of directors who liquidate a company and leave customers and suppliers out of pocket and then promptly set up another company often offering the same or similar service / product under a totally different company name I have had my fingers burnt by just such unsrcupulous persons on two occasions in the past five years and know other people who have been similarly caught out only to discover the person/s in business again within months

  • Andrew Suffield 21st Apr '14 - 4:04pm

    He’s about a year ahead of you on serial-failure directors:

    Cable plans tougher measures for failed company directors, July 2013.

    This particular set of plans is an important prerequisite: if people can hide what companies they own then you can’t regulate their behaviour at all.

  • Mark Seaman 21st Apr '14 - 5:25pm

    All well and good to SAY that he has rogue directors in his sights, but as the Government departments that were most likely to encounter such people, BIS & HMRC, have had significant job cuts (and certainly HMRC is due to shrink even further), then the chance of them being caught is going to fall.

  • Richard Dean 21st Apr '14 - 5:46pm

    Sounds like a good thing to do, but it does seem to imply that we in the UK are now going to be relying on other country’s justice systems to restrict some people’s rights or freedoms within the UK. I bet there’s a bit of a legal minefield involved, as well as some tricky foreign policy issues.

    Will we have a list of countries whose bans we accept? Would we accept an Argentinian ban on someone? A Nigerian ban? An Afghan one? Might there be tit-for-tat consequences?

  • Rabi Martins 21st Apr '14 - 10:08pm

    @Andrew Suffield – I must have missed that Do you know if the good intentions have turned into action yet ?

  • Robin Bennett 22nd Apr '14 - 10:02am

    @Richard Deans
    It might be best to have a tribunal to hear appeals against bans on the grounds that the overseas conviction has been spurious. Evidence of events in autocratic or dysfunctional regimes is not easily assessed, but our immigration tribunals and, ultimately, our courts are used to assessing the veracity of asylum seekers, for example. There may not be many such cases – regimes have plenty of other means of oppressing their opponents without it even occurring to them to bring false prosecutions for a non-existent commercial crime. However, this is not to say that such situations do not arise, e.g. there might be a spurious conviction of a political opponent for corruption (by a corrupt regime).

  • How big a problem is this? Rabi Martin’s well-made point about home grown directors (sometimes deliberately) putting themselves through, to the detriment of employees as well, and then restarting is surely a bigger issue and therefore a bit more voter-friendly now that we’re in the count-down.

  • Richard Dean 22nd Apr '14 - 2:06pm

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Alex Macfie
    The Scottish Highlands is one of those places where electoral success depends strongly on personal popularity, and ideology is a lesser consideration. If this A...
  • David Evans
    Kit, I sad to have to contradict you, but there is evidence. You seem to be choosing to ignore it and that is a concern. All the best, David...
  • Katharine Pindar
    Correction: Michael BG's important article on how deep poverty could be ended by 2029 was of course posted here in October 2023, not 2013; the reference I gave ...
  • David LG
    Bit worried that Angus MacDonald openly identifies himself as economically right wing on the highland lib dems website, how's that going to go down in such a po...
  • Simon R
    I agree with @Peter Martin. This idea from the Tories is laughably unworkable. It's obviously an election gimmick that hasn't been at all thought through. I al...