Vince Cable’s “After the Storm – The World Economy & Britain’s Economic Future”

after the stormWider in scope and more ambitious in its reach, “After the Storm” is the acclaimed sequel to “The Storm” published after the financial crisis of 2008.  Having spent the last 5 years as Business Secretary within the Coalition Government (2010-2015), Vince has the added clout of first-hand experience introducing economic policies that have steered us out of the storm, not least an industrial strategy.

His professed motivation for penning a sequel were to update readers on the state of Britain’s economy in “a climate of guarded optimism,” and to share his insights, no longer bound by collective responsibility as Secretary of State at the Department of Business Innovation and Science.  Whilst the US and UK are expected to record 3% growth this year, Vince’s previous analysis of the underlying weaknesses still apply, such as UK’s over reliance on the banking sector and on the housing market for recovery and growth.

True to form, Vince does not mince his words when it comes to the challenges he had faced in working with his Conservative colleagues in government.  He was denied a place on the Quad that was led from the Treasury, whom he described as “institutionally arrogant, obsessively short-termist and deeply conservative”.  He also flagged up differences with the Chancellor regarding, for example, RTB (right to buy Council and housing association properties) and on the direction and sale of RBS (Royal Bank of Scotland).

However what is clear from the outset is that the new book has a distinctly internationalist perspective.  The first half of the book is devoted to setting “The Global Context” and only in the second half does he deal with “The UK after the Crisis”.  As Vince is not shy to point out, Britain only contributes 2% towards the world GDP and has less than 1% of the world’s population.  In a world that is inter connected, we are not invulnerable to the serious issues faced by the Eurozone nor by the fluctuations in international commodity markets.  The economic centre of gravity has undoubtedly been shifting towards the emerging economies and it is now more apt to say that “when China sneezes, the world catches a cold”.

Other recurring themes are ideological: free market versus socialism, of growing inequality (with the richest 1% owning a third of the wealth in the US, a quarter in the EU) and the dangers of aggressive nationalism such as seen by the rise of UKIP and SNP.  He hints at wider issues such as those concerning internet governance, problems with large scale migration and global warming but could not pursue these in greater depth so as to avoid the book growing into one of encyclopaedic length.

Vince does however devote specific chapters to the “British Housing Obsession” and to “British Banking after the Banking Crash” and stresses the importance of getting the long-term fundamentals right.  In Government, he had endeavoured to constrain the financial markets and make banks safer and more amenable to lending via the Vickers Rules and the Merlin Project.  But it would probably have to be a future coalition of “progressives”, combining idealism with practical policies to break from current short sighted if not calamitous housing policies, unfair welfare cuts and de facto deflationary economic policies.

With in-depth economic and political analysis from a key player within the Coalition Government, “After the Storm” is essential reading to policy makers, academics as well as thinking members of the public.  In addition, Vince offers us a liberal/centre left political road map or should I say navigation chart.  The storm may be over, but we are warned of some dark clouds in the horizon.

* Merlene Emerson is is Vice-Chair of the Federal International Relations Committee and an Executive member of LibDems Overseas.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Books.
Advert

6 Comments

  • So Vince was denied a place on the Quad. If ever there was a red line that was it …….. It says much for either Clegg’s preference or weakness…….. There clearly was a cleavage at the top of the party between the Orangistas and the Social Liberals. What a legacy for Tim Farron to inherit…. And if he can’t resolve it I shudder for the party’s future.

  • I find it astonishing that Vince was denied a place on the Quad. This should have been a red line issue.

  • @ David Wright

    Understood and agreed, David. The question remains…. why wasn’t Vince appointed ? What does it tell us about the decision makers and their preferences……. and of course Mr Alexander was not first choice, it was David Laws. I leave it to others to decide if there is more of a hint of the Orange Book about all this.

  • Richard Underhill 10th Apr '16 - 7:09pm

    David Wright 6th Oct ’15 – 11:40pm
    Vince Cable was our candidate for Chancellor of the Exchequer, as per TV debates, but please remember that the Tories applied proportional representation to the number of MPs elected first-past-the-post.
    Readers should start on page 304 for some graphs which are punchy and obviously carefully chosen. Figure 9.3 shows house price to income ratio 1968 to 2013. Ouch.
    Figure11.1 shows UK Export market share from 1998 to 2014. Ouch again.
    He went to print in 2015, but might there be a causal link between housing costs and the current strikes of “Junior” doctors? Would it be too radical to reverse policy and use some hospital land for rented residential accommodation for health service staff?
    As Shirley Williams used to say “Find out where the shoe pinches”.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarHywel 22nd Jan - 1:16am
    Paul and Mary I think you could both be right - certainly slogans by themselves don't make or break a campaign (well they can if...
  • User AvatarPaul Holmes 22nd Jan - 12:42am
    Mary - I canvassed extensively last year and never found a single person who said anything about the slogan Demand Better -anymore than they ever...
  • User AvatarMary Regnier-Wilson 21st Jan - 11:48pm
    "we didn’t try beyond reciting for over 3 years Stop Brexit which we changed to Revoke at the last minute" this isn't strictly true Paul....
  • User AvatarJeff 21st Jan - 10:45pm
    Andrew Melmoth 20th Jan '20 - 11:50pm: 40% of leave voters polled shortly after the referendum wanted to stay in the single market. That sounds...
  • User AvatarJeff 21st Jan - 10:20pm
    Andrew Melmoth 20th Jan '20 - 11:50pm: The article you cite is an exercise in disinformation. Under the SGP the EU can recommend the UK...
  • User AvatarKit 21st Jan - 10:13pm
    Hywel, no need to be snide. The replicability crisis in academia is a well recognised and serious problem. So, some 'research' claiming that women only...