WATCH: Willie Rennie’s Facebook Live interview

Here is the Facebook Live interview that Willie Rennie did for the BBC yesterday:

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Lewee Buchan 11th Mar '17 - 3:11pm

    So Lib Dem policy is that there should be a second EU referendum but not a second referendum on Scottish independence?

    You want a re-run of the one you lost but not on the one you won?

    Somehow ‘Liberal Democrat’ seems a strange name.
    Can I suggest ‘Liberal sometimes-Democrat’?

  • Not at all.

    A referendum on the terms of Brexit would be equivalent to expecting a referendum on the terms of Scottish independence. As the Scottish people rejected the offer of independence, then there is no need for a further referendum on the terms of staying in the union. We have already have regular elections to deal with that.

  • …cringe factor 10 ((((((shudder)))))
    I’m not surprised the hall was empty!

  • Fiona

    It is impossible to justify the double standard applied relating to the referendum.
    It is laughable to suggest the LibDems are not trying to re-run the Brexit vote.
    It is an insult to our intelligence to suggest we will not be out of Europe shortly…and you know it!

  • No pigs this time, I’m pleased to say.

  • I understand the Lib Dems are passionate about Scotland remaining in the U.K. and the U.K. remaining in the E.U. but to argue for a referendum on the final Brexit deal which includes the option to stay, is to all intents and purposes, having a re-run of the initial remain / leave referendum with more choices and a little more clarity; it is disingenious to try and claim otherwise and the LibDems would be better off if they simply stated that is their goal is, to have and win another referendum resulting in the original leave vote being overturned and the U.K. remaining in the E.U. with no further referendum on the subject, ever.
    Given that the above is what they want for the E.U. it does look very strange to have a policy in which they would actively block a further Scottish independence referendum, even if the Scottish parliament had a majority to hold one, smacks very much of the you are too stupid to know what is good for you, so we, your betters, must protect you from your ignorance and unrestrained passsions.
    My opinion is it is too early for a further Scottish independence referendum but, if they want one they should have one. The government should say up front what their initial negotiating stance would be, and then if the Scottish voted out the whole U.K. should have a vote on the terms of the deal, why? because initially only Scotland will be voting as to whether to leave or not, however a decision to leave will impact on everyone, so the rest of the U.K should also get a vote on the terms of the deal. Key issues such as would Scotland stay in the currency union, what happens to Trident, where would U.K. warships be built, these and other issues can not just be determined by Westminster and Hollyrood if the rest of the U.K. has had no input into any part of the process at all.

  • Gareth Hartwell 16th Mar '17 - 5:29pm

    Sorry but I don’t understand why we would not let the Scots run an independence vote. It is quite clear that the argument has fundamentally changed as a result of Brexit (though which way is arguable).

    I am a member of the English Lib Dems which is a separate organisation to the Scottish Lib Dems but I cannot understand or support their position on this.

    Gareth

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Martin
    " As auntie appears to annoy politicos every stripe they must be doing something right." This is a lazy and dangerous line of argument: it merely enco...
  • David Evans
    I was sad to say that while the Thornhill report was tough in its findings and its conclusions, in all honesty it wasn't anything like tough enough, and its rec...
  • James Baillie
    I'm currently disinclined to support the proposals. I'm concerned about whether the "scrutiny committee" will have a meaningful enough role: we've seen with the...
  • Matt McLaren
    Thanks Callum, I agree that the Federal Board needs to be slimmed down and that the specific proposals coming to Spring Conference do very much provide for a de...
  • Paul Barker
    For me the crucial factor here is Size : large bodies are useless at making decisions. Conference needs to Vote for smaller bodies if we are serious. Clear dec...