Why Congress voted down the bail out plan

Good if very succinct analysis over at MyDD: overwhelmingly those in close races for their re-election voted against the bail out.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

13 Comments

  • Clegg's Candid Friend 29th Sep '08 - 11:58pm

    The Telegraph reports:
    “Vince Cable, Lib Dem Treasury spokesman, said he expected the FTSE to take a further tumble tomorrow on the back of the US rejection of the rescue plan”

    This man’s powers of prescience are truly remarkable! If only the rest of us could foresee the future with such clarity …

  • Yawn.

  • Clegg's Candid Friend 30th Sep '08 - 9:12am

    Martin:
    “If we accept your assurance (at faceless value) that you really are one of us”

    As I’ve pointed out to you a number of times, you don’t have to accept my assurance for anything – you can check with the site owners. Why do you keep pretending otherwise?

    As for my comment on Cable, it just amused me because it sounded like a statement of the blindingly obvious. Though, as of now, the FTSE is actually up …

  • David Heigham 30th Sep '08 - 11:32am

    Geffrey Payne

    The Paulson bail-out plan was deeply flawed. As presented, it was politcally naive, panicky and unintelligible. As rejected by Congress, it was barely workable, but far better considered.

    A number of other proposals on the table from academics look better focussed on the problem, more fully worked through, and lower cost to the US taxpayers. However, we will need a lot of luck to get one of these now. And the plan that Congress rejected could have been amanded after the election to improve it.

    I fear that we – and the Congressmen who voted against the plan – are going to really regret the rejection.

    CCF

    See Vince Cable’s post above.

  • Let’s face it – the main reason it was rejected is because the whole House of Representatives is up for election in a few weeks time, and a large number of them didn’t want to be seen to be supporting the dodgy bankers. A few Republicans may also have voted against it simply to spite Pelosi – which is, quite simply, astounding and a clear lack of responsibility.

    Eventually something will get through – not because it’s great, but because it has to. The Republicans will realise eventually that the political and social cost of letting the banks go bust will be greater than the cost of the financing.

    By the way, Nick Clegg’s suggestion of all parties working together in the UK on this seems to be a good one – Vince for Chancellor next week, anybody?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Martin
    Exams have been made easier. The subject matter is much more prescriptive and the breadth of knowledge is more restricted. This was apparent to me when betwee...
  • Chris Moore
    Charley, I haven't "sneered" at anybody, let alone today's school leavers. You have misunderstood where I'm coming from. I merely believe in an empirica...
  • David Raw
    @ Andrew Macgregor, you say ..... “The creation of the Labour Party via trade union representation occurred after the election of the first trade unionist t...
  • Mary ReidMary Reid
    The references to increased pass rates obscure the fact that a far higher proportion of young people are now taking qualifications at 18. I touched on some of t...
  • Joe Bourke
    Sadbh, the Cambridge dictionary defines working class as "a social group that consists of people who earn little money, often being paid only for the hours o...