YouGov marginals polls: a smattering of details

YouGov’s now annual mammoth marginals poll is out. It’s heavily talked about elsewhere, so here are a few extracts that are likely to be of particular interest to The Voice’s readers:

As was the case last year, there is still no sign of Liberal Democrat supporters tactically voting Conservative to oust Labour though neither is there any sign of them voting tactically against the Tories…

Sitting Liberal Democrat MPs continue to benefit from both anti-Conservative tactical voting and a personal vote…

[In Conservative vs Lib Dem seats] respondents are far more likely to recall having received literature or seen adverts from the Liberal Democrats than the Conservatives. [However, on recalling being canvassed last year’s Lib Dem lead is now a Tory lead.]

Asked about which issues were the most important, the biggest changes from last year were unemployment (up from 4% to 26%), law and order (down from 45% to 28% – surprisingly perhaps given that crime usually goes up as the economy suffers) and inflation (down from 16% to 4%). The top six issues this year are (in order) economy, health, law and order, unemployment, education and immigration/race-relations.

37% (up 3% from last year) agree, “I would vote Liberal Democrat if I thought they could win here”. Bearing in mind that is an average figure across the whole sample, the majority of which are Labour/Conservative seats, it shows just how great the potential is in the seats the Lib Dems are fighting seriously if that message can be got across in those seats.

Finally, a word of caution about individual seat predictions – because they’re based not on individual seats but instead on batches of seats. As YouGov’s Anthony Well’s explains:

Note that the seat predictions in the poll are all based on uniform swings within each group of similar seats – last time lots of people got the wrong end of the stick and through they were based on the 150 or so people in each individual seat, they aren’t, since the sample would be too low.

Given what we know about how variable results can be between different similar seats (compare the result last time in Hornsey and Wood Green or Manchester Withington with other seats that had a similar Labour lead for example), that means that even if the overall poll turns out to be 100% accurate in every other regard, the individual seat results will vary from the predictions listed.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Polls.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Nick Baird
    "there are still people arguing we don’t have a problem, and there’s no need for change" Are there? I think it's widely acknowledged that there is a prob...
  • Jonathan Calder
    I hope Jennie pointed out that it's not so long since we were in coalition with another party....
  • Roland
    The fire at Heathrow is also another reason why enlarging this airport (third runway) and making it even more of a single point of failure is ill considered. ...
  • Roland
    >” the target is Western Europe itself, with the aim of punishing or deterring Western nations from continuing their military support for Ukraine.” Foll...
  • Joseph Bourke
    Just being a Russian captain or having a fire break out is not a good basis for suspicion of foul play. However, the evidence of a violent campaign of sabotage ...