Your essential weekend reader — 8 must-read articles you may have missed

It’s Saturday morning, so here are eight thought-provoking articles to stimulate your thinking juices…

No, you’re not entitled to your opinion – Patrick Stokes at The Conversation argues that proper debate relies on contested claims based on relevant expertise: just holding to your own view ain’t enough.

Is The Economist left or right? – its digital editor Tom Standage answers the question ‘yes and no’: which can only mean that it’s really liberal.

Boris Johnson: The man who would be king – Andrew Gimson in The Spectator profiles “the Merry England maverick … already spoken of as a man for the top job or for no job at all”. And you can find out why I made Boris my CentreForum Liberal Hero of the Week here.

Liberalism’s Glass Jaw – Ross Douthat in the New York Times examines “the failures of the successes” of President Obama’s first term: “[the] lack of a plausible vision, more than his stutters and missed opportunities, is what doomed the president in last week’s debate. “

Jimmy Saville’s Knighthood: The Civil Service Rearguard – Damian McBride gives us the inside gen on the civil service’s rearguard action to block posthumous honours, including Gordon Brown’s attempts to have Alan Turing recognised.

Polling on abortion – Anthony Wells looks at what we know of public opinion — including that women voters are more likely than men, and Labour voters more likely than Conservatives, to favour a reduction in the abortion limit.

“Statutory” is not a bogey word – David Allen Green explains in the New Statesman why ‘statutory’ regulation of the press is not necessarily a bad thing, nor a good thing: “The crucial thing is whether any proposed scheme actually works, and in what ways.”

Are children less safe now? – Patrick Worrall analyses the contested data over at Channel 4#s FactCheck blog and sanely concludes: “there is no evidence that the most serious crimes against children are on the increase. There’s no statistical reason for parents to be more worried now than in previous years.”

* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from 2007 to 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , , , , , , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 17th Jan - 1:45am
    Expats, I think I have been clear that I support Libdem housing policy as updated last spring https://www.libdems.org.uk/spring-18-f4-local-government-housing This policy includes allowing receipts from the...
  • User AvatarMartin 16th Jan - 11:48pm
    Vince and our other parliamentarians need to remind Mrs May that her self imposed red lines are the stumbling block. We should not promise much...
  • User AvatarYeovil Yokel 16th Jan - 11:43pm
    “What should Vince say to Theresa?” - my reply would be unrepeatable, but my advice to Vince (not that he really needs it) is not...
  • User AvatarDavid Becket 16th Jan - 11:18pm
    It was a fair point from Gove, there was a tme when we favoured a referendum. To many we give the appearance of inconsistency on...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 16th Jan - 11:11pm
    @david Warren, I must eat my words when I say that I do not detect a groundswell for a change in voting system. There was...
  • User AvatarFiona 16th Jan - 11:09pm
    David, no tying in knots required to distinguish between a vote to validate the details of a massive constitutional change and a vote to instigate...