YouTube ‘cos we want to: Bercow, New Labour and Obama

Welcome to this Friday edition of our new LDV feature rounding up some of the best/worst/most curious political videos doing the rounds. Guaranteed Wimbledon/Jacko free.

First up, let’s enjoy new Speaker John Bercow’s well-publicised spat with ITN reporter Tom Bradby. Hard to choose between them who I feel least sympathy for, as both seem to be indulging in needless testosterone-charged irratibility:

After that starter, here’s the main course – Liberal Vision’s rather good 4-minute synopsis of the New Labour failure set to one of my all-time fave tracks, Nena’s 99 Red Balloons:

And finally for today – and yes, I know this is an ancient one now – here’s Jon Stewart’s take on President Obama’s ruthlessly efficient dispatch of a fly during a televised interview:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Obama Kills a Fly
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Jason Jones in Iran
Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in YouTube.
Advert

11 Comments

  • I’d never heard of Liberal Vision before, but was prompted to look at their website after viewing the anti-Labour video.
    Now, I may be a hang-over from mid-70s YL radical days, but aren’t these guys just crypto-tories?

  • To be fair, the video is typical of Liberal Vision’s output – mindlessly populist and with glaring oversights, as mentioned by Liam.

  • Antony Hook Antony Hook 27th Jun '09 - 5:47pm

    The 99 Red Balloons video is brilliant. I was really moved by the end. Labour have done so much damage to our country.

  • Angela Harbutt 29th Jun '09 - 12:51pm

    I am the creator of the 99 red balloons video and thought I should seek to answer some of the observations made.

    First and foremost I am sorry that some people have taken offence. To my mind however protest songs have been an accepted and effective means of protest for several decades. Putting images to those words is, in my view an acceptable extension of that practice and has indeed been used by news organisations, film makers and musicians to great effect.

    The music was chosen with great thought. This is not some music-pop mush. The original German lyrics were about a bunch of balloons that are let go in the sky. Some people think they’re UFO’s, whilst the Generals, who see them, interpret them as enemy craft and start a giant war. In other words it is a commentary on how quick authorities are to the trigger armies, without first finding out the facts of a situation.

    I see very clear parallels between this sentiment and the reaction to 9-11. A war waged on Iraq followed by a war waged on British citizens by its own government. If the video is at all shocking that is because what has happened in Iraq – and Britain with the destruction of civil liberties- is equally shocking.

    The images were chosen with extreme care and after much thought – many, many pieces of footage were not used. I believe it would have been a failure to those who died not to show Iraqi’s being pulled from bombed towns, insurgents being executed, or dead soldiers returning to the UK. It happened. All the footage was genuine.

    Were there omissions? Of course. It was a four minute video (there are only so many hours in the day) and I actually did want to try to stay as true to the lyrics as possible, leaving those watching with a sense of the over-riding message.

    I am never quite sure what people mean (or think they mean) by the the term “populist”. If they mean ” a supporter of the rights and power of people” – which has always been my understanding of the word, then I certainly am. I am also unsure how you can be “mindlessly populist”…

  • Tom Papworth 30th Jun '09 - 12:37am

    Liam,

    I take it that you are too young to remember The Rock and Roll Years, a BBC documentary series, each episode of which set the news from a particular year to the pop songs from that year.

    It covered the years 1956 to 1989 and consisted entirely of original news clips and pop songs accompanying original footage. Its content included the Vietnam War, the Sharpeville massacre, countless assassinations, Suez, the crushing of the Hungarian and Czech uprisings, the Miners’ Strike, the Falklands… More blood and horror than any person could wish to contemplate, all set to some of the greatest songs ever recorded.

    It was brilliant and moving and I would strongly recommend that you try to watch it some time. It will change the way you view this style of political commentary forever.

  • If “populist” is “a supporter of the right and power of the people” perhaps “mindless populist” is someone who holds these views instinctively and did not need some kind of road to Damascus moment where they realised the truth they simply knew it from the start?

  • Tom Papworth 30th Jun '09 - 4:54pm

    I think a “populist” is usually defined as one who does what is popular rather than what is right, or what one believes to be right.

    I suspect every reader of this blog who is also politically active will have come across an issue locally where popular opinion is strongly on one side and the party or candidate holds a strongly opposing view.

    In truth it is all too common that politicians succumb to electoral pressure and go for the cheap vote.

    OTOH, the Liberal Democrat policies on Europe and immigration are perhaps an example of anti-populism!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Hirst 16th Jan - 3:06pm
    A wise politician, especially a Westminster one might say that (s)he is not the wisest person to make these constitutional decision, being too easily influenced...
  • User Avatarnvelope2003 16th Jan - 3:05pm
    David Raw: The point I was trying to make was that restoring a railway can be cheaper than widening a road but it might not...
  • User AvatarNigel Jones 16th Jan - 3:04pm
    The two Davids are thinking in one of the right lines, but we need both their suggested policy action approach AND a positive vision for...
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 16th Jan - 3:00pm
    Peter Martin, Jennie's comment is on her own lived personal experiences: "It’s not metropolitan elitist to say that many leave voters voted the way they...
  • User AvatarJenny Barnes 16th Jan - 2:59pm
    This here people's vote. What's the question? You can hardly put TM's annihilated deal on the ballot, after what happened to it in Parliament. And...
  • User AvatarSean Hagan 16th Jan - 2:43pm
    Thank you, David Raw, for reminding us about the Jenkins Commission and the other political realities which made it impossible to extract a commitment from...