2010 local elections in Lewisham could be held under PR

Cllr Mark MorrisThe 2010 local elections in Lewisham could be held under a system of proportional representation following widespread support to a Liberal Democrat proposal at a recent Council meeting.

Proposing the motion Cllr Mark Morris said “Lewisham Council have volunteered for various pilot schemes at previous elections, now that Scotland have agreed to fight next years local election by a fairer system, Lewisham should lead the way in England.”

The motion which had cross- party support agreed noted that the Scottish local elections were being fought by single transferable vote (STV) and called for the next Lewisham full council elections to be fought under a fairer system. A proposal will be put to the relevant government departments requesting permission for Lewisham to operate a pilot scheme at the 2010 local elections.

Leader of Lewisham Liberal Democrats Cllr Mark Morris said, “If Councils up and down the Country demand STV for local elections the Government might agree to several pilot schemes and that could herald the end of the first pass the post system south of the border as well as in Scotland.”

(Image sourced from Lewisham Liberal Democrats)

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • hywelmorgan 27th Oct '06 - 2:15pm

    I thought the relevant piece of legislation didn’t allow pilots using a different electoral system though.

    Still a good idea – if 20-30 local authorities did the same it would create some pressure for a change and the local government area is where we should really concentrate efforts on PR as we can use the idea of bringing England & Wales into line with the other two nations in the UK.

  • hywelmorgan 27th Oct '06 - 4:15pm

    Don’t think so in this regard. They needed a bill to change the date in 2001 and for the all-postal pilots in 2004.

    It’s not impossible there is some enabling power in the bill which allows the operation of pilots (RPA 2000 I think it is – they all begin to merge in my head a bit!). The government is fond of doing that sort of thing – the 2004 Act gave the secretary of state the power to make ANY change to election law that he saw fit. He could have universal suffrage at that election and have been acting totally lawfully (actually there would have been Human Rights implications but why spoil a good point 🙂

    As you point out though a private bill might be the next option Lewisham could consider

    I could look up the detail but not just at the moment 🙂

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tim Rogers
    Might finally wake SirEd out of his invisibility....
  • Jana
    Hi Tom, Do you think Burnham is preparing the ground for a snap election? Lots of little goodies delivered each day for a couple of weeks then claim he needs a...
  • Hywel
    Increasing the basic threshold by £1000 will make someone on £40,000pa £200 a year better off whilst doing nothing for someone on £12000 a year though. "...
  • Tony Vickers
    Not higher taxes but different taxes. We said in our 2015 manifesto we'd look at how (not whether) to introduce a Land Value Tax within a single Parliament. Co...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Daniel, You could have a point. Do you mean the government of the Federal Republic Of Germany? They certainly adopted the position of speaking for the ...