2010 local elections in Lewisham could be held under PR

Cllr Mark MorrisThe 2010 local elections in Lewisham could be held under a system of proportional representation following widespread support to a Liberal Democrat proposal at a recent Council meeting.

Proposing the motion Cllr Mark Morris said “Lewisham Council have volunteered for various pilot schemes at previous elections, now that Scotland have agreed to fight next years local election by a fairer system, Lewisham should lead the way in England.”

The motion which had cross- party support agreed noted that the Scottish local elections were being fought by single transferable vote (STV) and called for the next Lewisham full council elections to be fought under a fairer system. A proposal will be put to the relevant government departments requesting permission for Lewisham to operate a pilot scheme at the 2010 local elections.

Leader of Lewisham Liberal Democrats Cllr Mark Morris said, “If Councils up and down the Country demand STV for local elections the Government might agree to several pilot schemes and that could herald the end of the first pass the post system south of the border as well as in Scotland.”

(Image sourced from Lewisham Liberal Democrats)

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • hywelmorgan 27th Oct '06 - 2:15pm

    I thought the relevant piece of legislation didn’t allow pilots using a different electoral system though.

    Still a good idea – if 20-30 local authorities did the same it would create some pressure for a change and the local government area is where we should really concentrate efforts on PR as we can use the idea of bringing England & Wales into line with the other two nations in the UK.

  • hywelmorgan 27th Oct '06 - 4:15pm

    Don’t think so in this regard. They needed a bill to change the date in 2001 and for the all-postal pilots in 2004.

    It’s not impossible there is some enabling power in the bill which allows the operation of pilots (RPA 2000 I think it is – they all begin to merge in my head a bit!). The government is fond of doing that sort of thing – the 2004 Act gave the secretary of state the power to make ANY change to election law that he saw fit. He could have universal suffrage at that election and have been acting totally lawfully (actually there would have been Human Rights implications but why spoil a good point 🙂

    As you point out though a private bill might be the next option Lewisham could consider

    I could look up the detail but not just at the moment 🙂

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tristan Ward
    @ Judy Abel (cont) Painful as they are for the consumer, right now I think high oil and gas prices are a good thing. They incentivise the transition to chea...
  • Tristan Ward
    @Judy Abel I have looked at your links. I see no reason to rule profit out of any sector as a matter of principle with a few exceptions. For children's...
  • Tim Rogers
    Another example of an increasingly multi polar world. Obviously Iran will be uppermost in people's minds but India Israel Cyprus and Greece have all had recent ...
  • Jana
    Do you think these developments may cause India to move closer to Russia and China? If it does, an alliance of the country with the largest nuclear stockpile, ...
  • Chris Perry
    A wealth tax would increase the income of the Government but not of the lower paid and would be dealing with the symptom and not the cause. In 1980 the average ...