3 to see: Lib Dem #GE2010 campaign coverage (15/4/10)

Pushed for time, but want to keep up-to-date with how the campaign’s going? Here are today’s must-reads …


  • Liberal Democrat manifesto: Tough but fair (Guardian)
  • There’s a warm welcome for the party’s manifesto from the two progressive quality papers. Here’s the Grauniad:

    Right now, the Liberal Democrats are in the midst of what may be the most important 48 hours of their entire election campaign. The manifesto launch suggests that the Lib Dems are well aware of the stakes. For their moment in the spotlight, they chose a focused, costed and serious political message. Unlike the design-led offerings of their opponents, the Lib Dem manifesto is content-led. With the party’s four key priorities on tax, schools, jobs and political reform listed on its front, this is one book that you can judge by its cover.

    The Indy praises the party’s “realistic and imaginative solutions”, and notes two factors in the party’s favour:

    The widespread feeling of “a plague on both their houses”, attributable in part to the MPs’ expenses scandal, helps explain why more voters favour the outcome of a hung parliament than a victory by either of the main parties. So might the increasingly confident performances put in by the Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg.

  • Opportunity knocks for Nick Clegg in a political talent show (Times)

  • Have you heard? Apparently there’s something on t’telly tonight, and Peter Riddell has some advice for the Lib Dem leader:

    Nick Clegg has his big chance tonight. The least publicly known of the three main leaders is being treated as an equal in a nationally televised event. Mr Clegg’s advisers could hardly believe their luck when Conservative and Labour negotiators agreed to his participation in all three debates.

    But opportunity is not the same as achievement. His basic tactic is obvious: to differentiate himself from the two other leaders by playing the trust/candour card as he did at the manifesto launch. He wants to personalise a new start for those disenchanted with mainstream politics, emphasising his distinctive stand on civil liberties and “trust in politics”. This is tricky for someone who has been a full-time politician for much of his adult life.

    He has to adopt a different style from Prime Minister’s Questions when he has to be assertive, even strident, to make an impact. Rather, he has to be the reasonable man, to sound authentic, but not too wordy or patronising.

  • LIB-DEM ELECTION MANIFESTO: LET ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS BECOME BRITISH CITIZENS (Express)
  • Sometimes it’s the bad press the party can be most proud of – to attract the opprobrium of the nastily right-wing rag the Express is one such badge of honour:

    NICK Clegg threw open Britain’s ­borders to thousands of immigrants yesterday when he insisted that ­foreigners living here illegally were welcome to become UK citizens.

    In a startling pre-election pledge, the Liberal Democrat leader said that those people who had been living in the UK without the correct documentation would be allowed to become British citizens after 10 years if they spoke English, had a clean record and wanted to live here long-term.

    Sounds good to me.

    These are the three pieces which caught my eye – seen or heard anything else in today’s media to draw LDV readers’ attention to? Let us know in the comments thread.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in General Election.
Advert

4 Comments

  • I do love the express for its qualities as a joke.

    Good press, thumbs up here!

  • Andrew Suffield 15th Apr '10 - 1:24pm

    I am often inclined to think there is wisdom in the idea that a good way to judge a person’s character is by the quality of the enemies they make.

  • I would agree that getting the Express worked up isn’t something to worry about. However, I am concerned at the policy of earned citzenship/asylum. There is already a concession operated by the Home Office that allows those who have clean records and no overstaying the opportunity of idefinite leave to remain after 10 years or, if there has been overstaying, then after 14 years. However, publicising such a policy can only attract more illegal migrants. It has been shown time after time that amnesties just create a greater demand among would-be migrants to get to those countrries that offer them. The policy is wrong-headed.

  • “NICK Clegg threw open Britain’s ­borders”

    They seem to think he is Prime Minister!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jeff
    How relevant is this to Trump’s MAGA movement, to Farage and Reform? Of little to none I would have thought. The political ideologies that came to d...
  • Nonconformistradical
    I second Henry's comments about Barrow - this south-eastener has at least, albeit not recently, set foot in the Barrow constituency (visiting friends who lived ...
  • John Peters
    I would not have classed Barrow-in-Furness as post industrial. For decades it has had the same major employer - the dockyards. It manafactures the UK's nuclear ...
  • David Raw
    @ Daniel Walker, "we should have the cheapest possible democracy". I didn't say that, Daniel, though what I imply is that the party needs to prove to and mak...
  • Henry
    I do get very annoyed by the comments on these by-election posts. The over-exaggeration of our comeback because we won last week and then complain when we finis...