380 Conservative candidates go missing

And then they were mostly found again; thanks to the person who pointed out the reason for the bulk of the difference in the comments. I think the few who are still missing are best not fussed over 🙂

A little while back the Conservatives boasted about the number of candidates they were standing in the local elections. This story is no longer on their website as this link shows though thanks to Iain Dale we can all still read the numbers.

Why might you want to read the numbers? Well, the (independent) Press Association has now added up the number of candidates from each party and the Conservative total in England is actually 380 fewer than they claimed (8,884 compared with 9,264).

Oops.

P.S. If this was the Liberal Democrats, I am sure you can imagine the frothing at the mouth indignation on Conservative blogs about lies, dodgy statistics, gutter politics, shoddy cover-ups and predictable mud-slinging. But I’m a nice chap, so I won’t froth. But feel free to froth on your own.

P.P.S. Boring technical bits: some variation in the figures is to be expected because of some late withdrawls that may have happened after the Conservative figures were published and, having double-checked the breakdown of the figures, I am comparing England with England. It’s not a matter of one set including Scotland and the other not.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • The Conservative’s own figure is the total of all their English regional figures whilst the PA figure is their UK total minus their Scottish total.

    i.e. they are both England only figures.

  • Not a supporter 23rd Apr '07 - 7:53pm

    Or could the 380 be those who have already been returned unopposed, and so are no longer candidates?

    In which case, that would be egg on your face, I presume?

  • I prefer my eggs scrambled. I’ll go ready a frying pan.

  • Hywel Morgan 23rd Apr '07 - 8:10pm

    The PA figures say 365 Tories returned unopposed so that still doesn’t quite add up.

    Plus it would be odd to refer to candidate totals as not including those returned unopposed.

  • Hywel Morgan 23rd Apr '07 - 8:11pm

    OK so PA are being odd by the looks of it!

  • It's atwo-horse race 23rd Apr '07 - 9:59pm

    Maybe, just maybe, this story is true – I don’t know. But Conservatives are contesting 88% of seats up for grabs Vs. 64% for the Lib Dems. Why the shortage?

    People in glass houses…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Allen
    The deafening silence about who might be a good new LD leader tells its own story. A leadership change is a big opportunity for a party to reposition itself an...
  • Neil Hickman
    For good reason, Town Council byelections normally aren't included. But I think the result in Uckfield West is worth noting. Straight fight between the Lib Dem...
  • Peter Martin
    LibDems aren't invisible. If you were, you wouldn't have 72MPs and thousands of councillors. You don't have more because yourselves and the Labour Party aren't ...
  • Kevin Hawkins
    Here is my usual monthly summary of the last fifty local by-elections. Percentage Vote Share: Reform 24.46%, Labour 18.81%, Conservatives 17.13%, Liberal ...
  • David Raw
    In Sheffield Southey (Brightside constituency) the Lib Dem vote has dropped by half to a mere 2.2% and fifth place. Is it not a cause for concern that in 20...