The Snoopers’ Charter: A government invasion?

During coalition we blocked the Snoopers Charter. The bill, resurrected under the name of the Investigatory Powers Bill, shows the intent of the Tory Government – to degrade all forms of privacy we once held dear.

This new Bill isn’t much different than the old one. It gives the police the power to indiscriminately record internet connection data, tap phone calls and scariest of all – give the security services the power to hack all electronic devices we own. The Bill has been marketed to MPs and the wider public as a necessity to public safety, but in reality it is nothing more than a draconian measure to curb our civil liberties in a move akin to the Stasi in East Germany.

It’s not only civil rights groups who are concerned, it’s the tech community too. Questions are being raised about the bill as to whether or not it’s actually possible to implement. Part the proposed Investigatory Powers Bill legally requires Internet service providers (ISPs) to archive connections a device makes to the internet and hold that data for a minimum of a year. What Theresa May needs to understand is that this is a lot of data. Nobody for certain can put a finger on just how much data that is but one thing is for certain; Cataloguing it will be a wonder of the computing world.

Let’s assume that the government has successfully completed their task of cataloguing my connections to a youtube server containing the cat video I wanted to watch – along with the 10 million others who watched the video in the UK. What now? How can the security services decide which data is useful in the fight against terrorism, and which data is a product of procrastination? This isn’t a new problem, just ask the United States National Security Agency. They have too much untargeted data for any of it to be useful, only leading to their counter terrorism operations to be more inefficient and less cost effective.

Overall, it’s clear we need to think very hard as a country. Do we decide to sacrifice our privacy to a Tory government who seems hell bent on intruding into our personal lives? Or do we simply say no.

* Elliott Motson is Gateshead Lib Dems Campaign Support Officer. As well as VC of LY North East and VC of Middlesbrough and East Cleveland.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • nigel hunter 5th Mar '16 - 11:57am

    It reminds me of the FBI tussle with Apple. Open the door slightly and it is not long before it is completely open. This bill should be put in the bin.

  • This new Bill isn’t much different than the old one.

    From what Elliott has written, I doubt he has actually read either the Draft IPB (released 4-Nov-2015) or the First reading version (introduced to the house on the 1-Mar-2016).

    For those interested the full text of the bill before Parliament may be found here:

    and the Draft IPB here:

    What is concerning is that the bill introduced to Parliament hasn’t take much notice of the various committee reports on the Draft IPB. Suspect this is most probably because the government is in a hurry to get the legislation on the book before the end of 2016 when various powers will lapse if not renewed. This speed is concerning because it will limit considered examination and debate and may well mean the final Act will need further revision – through the use of undemocratic Statutory Instruments…

  • AC Trussell 6th Mar '16 - 3:27pm

    I have heard that it will not just be the web-sites you have visited, but ALL the data; that is content of e-mails – everything! That is because; should you become suspect they can then use it. And so can any hacker……..!

  • @AC Trussell – I heard that pigs can fly, I personally don’t believe it until I can see it with my own eyes. I suggest you would be well advised to do likewise and read the published information on the IPB…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGlenn 10th Dec - 6:45am
    leave voters tend to be older . Older people aren't so easy to get marching about . This is why political "causes" tend to like...
  • User AvatarDenis Loretto 10th Dec - 12:10am
    The last thing we need is any hint of squabbling within the growing People's Vote campaign of which we Lib Dems are clearly an integral...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 10th Dec - 12:01am
    I don't think that People's Vote is sidelining the Liberal Democrats. The issue is that the amendment does not have cross party support or the...
  • User Avatarfrankie 9th Dec - 10:45pm
    Interesting to see the much vaunted Betrayal of Brexit managed to garner 500 more people than a meeting in the Excel Centre. They lack the...
  • User AvatarTony Greaves 9th Dec - 10:43pm
    My good friend Bill le Breton is wrong again in this thread! Twice in a row!! Perhaps I should have a good talk with him...
  • User AvatarTonyH 9th Dec - 10:27pm
    I agree that Caroline Lucas is a better public advocate than Vince. I don't agree that she is better than Layla or Christine or Tom....