A lack of democracy at Unlock Democracy

The pressure group Unlock Democracy is generally pretty good at understanding that having a healthy democracy is more than simply about the narrow confines of casting and counting votes. Healthy democracy involves meaningful debate and choice between a range of views.

That makes the latest mailing I have received from them all the most disappointing. Good news – supporters are being asked to submit nominations for its governing council. Bad news – the highly restrictive campaigning rules that make even the old Liberal Democrat internal election rules seem rather generous:

Candidates may not produce any further promotional materials [in addition to the ballot mailing manifesto] … No candidate may pro-actively campaign for election online, or allow anyone else to campaign on their behalf … The Returning Officer may disqualify any candidate who they deem to have made a public statement to promote their candidacy.

As for that ballot mailing manifesto, it can only by 300 words. Not even an artworked piece of A5. Other than that: sssssh!

Imagine if the government were to propose such a stringent set of campaign restrictions for public elections. Would Unlock Democracy say, “You know what, that’s a darn good idea”? I hope not – but just as campaigning is healthy in public elections because it allows voters to make better informed choices, so it is too in internal  contests.

It does at least make my voting in the Council elections easy when the ballots come round. If you’re in favour of these rules, you won’t be getting my vote.

For another reaction to these election rules see Mark Valladares: Throwing away the key … how not to run an internal election.

* Mark Pack is Party President and Co-leader of the party. He is editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Agreed, my eyebrows raised to the sky when I saw it. The discretionary power in one person’s hands to decide on allowing or disallowing candidates is not democracy at all, it’s like those show elections in countries with a dominant party and censored media, where other parties get disqualified if their challenge would be serious.

  • “If you’re in favour of these rules, you won’t be getting my vote.” But how will you find out???

  • James Graham (UD) 30th Mar '12 - 5:57pm

    Unlock Democracy’s internal election regulations are decided by our members.  The rules are designed to provide a level playing field and to prevent wealthier candidates from having too great an advantage.  The current rules were set before Facebook and Twitter were in widespread use.

    Any member concerned about these rules could have submitted a standing order amendment to our AGM.  No-one did so. We are keen to encourage as many members as possible to stand for election.  For more details see our website: http://www.unlockdemocracy.org.uk/elections

  • Unlock Democracy have been strangely silent in recent months during constitutional outrages like stuffing the Lords full of peers to create a Government majority or the airbrushing unregistered voters out of our electoral geography

    What we need is to create a truly independent force to campaign for democratic reform in this country, one that could command a genuine popular following

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarFormer Dem 11th Aug - 1:29pm
    Alex Macfie David Raw I agree with both of you to some extent. The LDs were complete suckers in sharing government ministries with the Tories...
  • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 11th Aug - 1:20pm
    David Raw, thank you for your replies. You say that you object to the idea that the "Times Rich List" would receive Universal Basic Income....
  • User AvatarBarry Lofty 11th Aug - 1:08pm
    David: I am sure we could argue, discuss all that went on inside that coalition but I took it rather more personally at the time...
  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 11th Aug - 12:59pm
    Whilst we Lib Dems consider the Conservative government an enemy, because they hold different views to us, we depart from liberal principles. Liberals should respect...
  • User AvatarAndrew Toye 11th Aug - 12:55pm
    I agree that wellbeing should be a priority, but it’s one of those things that are difficult to measure or plan for. David Cameron introduced...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 11th Aug - 12:48pm
    Alex Macfie No Rose Gardens butters no parsnips. It's what they did that matters, the rest is froth.