A small victory on council snooping

It’s not all bad news this week, though. Local councils’ use of surveillance powers, which have been notoriously misused to investigate offences like dog-fouling and lying about your school catchment area, must now be sanctioned by elected councillors “or senior officials”.

This is being headlined by some as a “ban” on snooping, but that’s not what it is. It’s at best a hopeful sign of increased accountability. My joy is guarded partly owing to the “senior officials” rider, and partly because the whole idea falls short of the Lib Dem proposal to require a magistrate’s consent before surveillance takes place, and to limit its usage to “serious offences”.

Chris Huhne:

This consultation is a tacit admission by the Government that its surveillance society has got out of hand.

For too long, powers we were told would be used to fight terrorism and organised crime have been used to spy on people’s kids, pets and bins.

Without reform, RIPA will continue to be a snoopers’ charter. Surveillance powers should only be used to investigate serious crimes and must require a magistrate’s warrant.

Ministers must ensure that this consultation results in real changes and not just warm words.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @Tristan, "...if all the money belonging to all the world’s billionaires were distributed equally among all of us we would have $1,250 each." ...
  • Nick Baird
    @John Barrett - the choice to ban children from social media rather than regulate is the one that will be harder to enforce and will be less effective. It is p...
  • Tanya Park
    Cian's right that this is the wrong call. On the seatbelt analogy. Seatbelts make an activity safer without removing it. A ban removes the activity itself, i...
  • Lin Macmillan
    Amanda, I am constantly amazed by all you do and achieve despite your caring responsibilities. It is a blot on our society that carers are so poorly recognised...
  • Steve J Smith
    Even Save The Children are against this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S47oBPzphCw TechDirt did a very good piece on it too. There's no evidence that kids ar...