Author Archives: David Hall-Matthews

Opinion: 2013 – Time to think afresh about International Development?

Lynne Featherstone in Zambia. Photo:  some rights reserved by DFID http://www.flickr.com/photos/dfid/8220719712/Another year, another set of attacks on development aid in the right-wing press. Prompted by a spectacularly ill-informed paper from Civitas, the Telegraph, Mail and Spectator tried once again to argue, without evidence, that high proportions of British aid are wasted.

The truth is that, under the Coalition, far more attention has been paid to value for money in aid spending than ever before. What is more, there’s little need to speculate about where

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , , and | 22 Comments

Opinion: Why the UK should keep its promises on international aid

The best use of aid for International Development has been a controversial topic recently, with rows over the need for aid to India spilling onto the front pages – many of them spectacularly ill-informed on both sides. That issue is complex – but at least you can rely on Liberal Democrats to think about it carefully. In 2010, I chaired a policy working group on international Development, which argued that the UK should focus on supporting good governance, sovereignty and accountability to the poor, so that countries could move away from aid dependency. As India has all of those, we argued that aid to India could stop now. However, with more people living below the poverty line in India than the whole of Africa, the counter-argument is also strong. In the end an amendment from House of Commons International Development Select Committee Chair Malcolm Bruce, calling for aid to continue for now, was supported by conference.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 3 Comments

Opinion: Interpreting the internal election results

The bare bones of the internal party election results were set out here on Saturday showing who had been elected by conference reps to the various committees.

The detailed results for the Federal Executive and the Federal Policy Committee, hosted by Colin Rosenstiel, show some revealing trends when compared with previous years’ election results.

This year, in the Federal Executive elections, Evan Harris came top on first preference by a long stretch with 263 votes. Following him was David Rendel (107) and Ramesh Dewan (77) with others on 55. Evan is clearly identified with the progressive, Social Liberal wing …

Posted in Op-eds and Party policy and internal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , and | 38 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Raw 31st Mar - 9:53am
    @ expats Just to say every good wish to you and your wife, expats. Best, David....
  • User AvatarJulian Tisi 31st Mar - 9:47am
    I was on a zoom meeting yesterday and I commented on someone's bookshelf behind them - it looked like one of those "politician's" bookshelves with...
  • User AvatarDenis Loretto 31st Mar - 9:46am
    As will be clear to LDV addicts from the several posts I have made in the last week or so, I completely agree with Lorenzo....
  • User Avatarlloyd harris 31st Mar - 9:43am
    Sad times we are in that we might have to go a whole year without conference. Online is fine for speeches, training etc. where there...
  • User AvatarFiona 31st Mar - 9:41am
    @James I fear you are right and that some of the enforcement that's supposed to keep us safe is about stopping us from getting any...
  • User Avatarexpats 31st Mar - 9:24am
    .....................................Has the Government been less than wholly accurate in its explanations over why the United Kingdom didn’t take in EU projects to bulk-buy medical kit?.............................
Mon 27th Apr 2020