Author Archives: David Murray

What could the long overdue reform of the House of Lords look like?

Overdue Reform of the House of Lords

Talk about reforming the House of Lords has been going on for many decades but in 2011 a cross-party draft bill proposed 300 members, 80% elected and 20% appointed. The bill was dropped in 2012, and there has been no political commitment to implement such a major change to its constitution since then. 

Currently, Keir Starmer is legislating to remove those left in 1999 when hereditary lords were removed, leaving 92 of them to remain “until further reform is proposed”. However, Starmer is claiming that future Lords reform will take place step by step, as yet undefined, so in theory the remaining lords should be safe until that further reform happens!

Most agree a change is needed, but to what? A Senate with Senators? An Upper House? If most of them are going to be elected, maybe members should be called Counsellors as they will be ‘advising’ (and voting) on the legislation going through Parliament, but certainly not Lords, as that harps back to the aristocracy. 

Nor would there be any more life peerages for the party hacks and cronies who pack the Lords currently. Elections and appointments would be for a term of 3 to 5 years, maybe not all taking place at the same time, to ensure a degree of continuity. Those who had genuine expertise could apply for any of the appointed positions, not judged politically by any of the parties, but independently. Or they could stand for election in whichever Region they had their principal residence, but not from other homes, work locations, or land ownership.

Recent talk has been suggesting a reduction to around half the present numbers, perhaps with a maximum of 400 to ensure sufficient to deal with the legislation coming through the Commons. 75% of these would be elected, the balance appointed. The elected Regional allocation would be based on the last EU distribution for UK MEPs, and adjusted by the current distribution determined by the 2023 Review of UK constituencies set out below:

 

Region          EU MEPs         2023 MPs         Allocation

E Midlands            5                       47                               21

Eastern                   7                        61                               28

London                   8                        75                                35

North East             3                        27                                13

North West           8                        73                                 34

South East          10                        91                                 43

South West          6                          58                                26

W Midlands         7                          57                                26

Yorkshire etc       6                          54                                25

Scotland              6                           57                                26

Wales                  4                            32                                15

N Ireland           3                             18                                 8

Total:             73                        650                         300

If the Lords Spiritual were also reduced from 26 to 12, representing not just the CofE but representatives of UK religions based on their proportionate affiliation, this would be fairer as part of the appointed 100. 94% of those responding to the 2021 Census contributed to that optional question, and Christian affiliation fell to 46%, the first time it was below 50%.

Assuming that representation would be agreed, a possible division of the 12 could be:

Catholics: 3; Church of England: 3; Islam: 2; Methodist, Baptist and URC: 1; 

Church of Scotland and other denominations: 1; Hindu, Sikh and Buddhist: 1;  

Jew, Humanist and other religions: 1.  

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 35 Comments

Federal Bored !

The Thornhill Report was severely critical of our governance and control. The feedback to the Review identified severe strategy shortcomings, leadership, organisation, and disconnect at all levels of the party. In particular, the report claimed, “the Federal Board was often a ‘rubber-stamp’ and is too large a group to be a realistic decision-making body.” There is no way that cohesive decisions can be made simply, quickly, and effectively. “The Federal Board – 40+ members – is not, cannot, and should not be that team.”

So instead of recreating itself and its function, the Federal Board has created a ‘Steering Group’ that is composed of 14 of the existing 43 Board members. This plans to become the decision-making and strategy-generating body for the party. The Steering Group has two directly elected members, (the President and a Vice-Chair), Acting Co-Leader until new Leader elected, Vice President (appointed) representatives of the three state parties, five federal committees, the Young Liberals and Principal Councils. That leaves the 29-member rump of the Federal Board with no contributory purpose.

Posted in Op-eds | 24 Comments

Opinion: A liberal future

In the conclusion to his book ‘The Future of Politics’ published in 2000, Charles Kennedy stated

It will not be possible to categorize the voter of 2020 as a socialist, or a conservative. Instead, the voter of 2020 will be a variety of things: internationalist, green, committed to properly funded public services, technologically aware and liberal. That could make the voter of 2020 a natural Liberal Democrat supporter – but only if he or she hasn’t lost faith in politics altogether.

He believed that politicians have to restore a sense of idealism to politics, but that first, we have to know what our ideals are, and re-define our basic principles. Charles made clear that his key principle was a firm belief in liberty. As we consider electing a new leader, I would urge both old and new members to read this book before voting. I read it when it was first published, and have just read it again, following his tragic death.

There is much in the book that is as relevant today, as when it was published in 2000. It was three years into a ‘New Labour’ government under Tony Blair, and the government was already beginning to lose trust with the public, after all the initial euphoria of 1997. Charles emphasised that,

Posted in News | Tagged and | 37 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • John Mc
    This is all good stuff, but honestly, who is really getting to hear it? Reform have 5 MPs yet seem to be being anointed as a government in waiting. The LDs hav...
  • Simon R
    @David Evans: Are you seriously trying to compare maintaining the level of the pension at its current level in real terms (which is what would be implied by scr...
  • David Evans
    Hi Simon (R), I do have difficulty in understanding how you can make such a post and justify it by the one reason, "That doesn’t seem to me like something to ...
  • David Raw
    As someone of a certain generation whose Party slogan was "People matter, People Count", I've nothing to add to the BBC News today : "As Palestinians pou...
  • Simon R
    @Cassie: Why do you feel that talk about ending the triple lock should make pensioners worry? Ending the triple lock doesn't mean anything silly or mean like en...