Author Archives: Fred Carver

Fred Carver

Opinion: 80 million people like this

By Fred Carver | Sat 19th February 2011 - 2:42 pm

In my previous post I said I thought the role of social media in Tunisia was a bit of a red herring. I wanted to expand on that thought.

As I said on my own blog Wikileaks and social media played a role in Tunisia, and also in Egypt, but these things should be understood as helpful tools, not the root causes themselves. I thought the Foreign Policy article George Kendall cited was weak and the case for Wikileaks as a direct cause of the protests somewhat thin – even by the Foreign Policy article author’s own …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , and | 10 Comments
Fred Carver

Opinion: Interesting proposal, Mr Kendall, but who is “us”?

By Fred Carver | Wed 16th February 2011 - 3:55 pm

George Kendall’s piece on Julian Assange was quite good. If it wasn’t I’d scarcely bother replying. And no, I am not Mr Assange’s spokesman, but as Mr Assange’s spokesman is quite busy I thought I’d jump in and attempt a defence.

Firstly I think Tunisia is a bit of a red herring here, and it would in any case provide only an empirical proof to say that Wikileaks is good or bad based upon one revolution or several. It would say nothing about the general morality. I’d much rather argue from general principles, as George Kendall then goes on to do.

As I can see it there are two elements to his proof:

  1. That some things do need to be kept hidden
  2. That the decision as to what those things should be should be taken by elected leaders.
Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , and | 6 Comments
Fred Carver

Opinion: No more broken promises

By Fred Carver | Fri 5th November 2010 - 2:28 pm

no student tuition feesIf you remember, this is the opening frame of the party political broadcast the Lib Dems aired just a few days before standing for election in May. You may remember it: Nick Clegg wondered around what appeared to be the set of “I am Legend” on a day when the prevailing wind was coming from the foolscap factory wearing a jacket 8 sizes too big for him. The tagline, the message, indeed the point of the advert was “no more broken promises” – the …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | 24 Comments
Fred Carver

Opinion: Condorcet 101, or We Can Do Better Than AV

By Fred Carver | Fri 29th October 2010 - 10:42 am

Attentive readers may have noticed I am not a fan of the alternative vote. I don’t think it is proportional – because it isn’t. However, it is not a bad system for selecting a candidate for a single vacancy. On this basis the Lib Dems use it extensively for internal elections when there is only one vacancy. However it is, to my mind, not the fairest such system.

No single vacancy system can be proportional. That is why the Lib Dems rightly push for Single Transferable Vote in every election they can. However, there will always be single vacancy elections: for …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 34 Comments
Fred Carver

Opinion: What the US midterms do (and don’t) mean for the Liberal Democrats

By Fred Carver | Sun 17th October 2010 - 2:44 pm

I’ve heard a few Liberal Democrats express concern about the mid-term election results. The fear, as it has been expressed to me, is that Cleggmania had a lot of superficial similarities to Obamamania – it was a campaign based on hope, by a progressive liberal who offered something new, and it led to the formation of a government. Seeing Obamamania apparently swept away in a surge of vehemently conservative tea-partyers, several Lib Dems fear that the same fate could befall them at the next election.
I think this is simplistic.

Continue reading »
Posted in LDVUSA and Op-eds | Tagged | 9 Comments
Fred Carver

Opinion: the Australian election and AV

By Fred Carver | Wed 1st September 2010 - 1:40 pm

Fans of the alternative vote system would do well to look at the result of the Australian election. Australia and Fiji are the only two countries in the world to use AV. The two main parties got about 80% of the vote. A record* 2 million+ people voted for minor parties, that’s around 17% – a 50% increase of the number of people not voting for the big two.

And the result? Well the two main parties got 145 seats and the minor parties 5.

Now at this point defenders of AV will be saying “yes we know AV isn’t that good …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , and | 50 Comments
Fred Carver

Opinion: Lib Dems should abstain or campaign for “No” on AV referendum

By Fred Carver | Tue 27th July 2010 - 12:20 pm

I’m passionate about PR. But when it comes to PR AV is, at best, a red herring.

Be very clear, AV is not one jot more proportionate than what we have now. It is a system of first Past the Post pure and simple. It does have other positive characteristics (although personally I think both our current FPTP and AV are systems I’d score at 0 out of 10) but it is not one iota more proportionate than the system we have now.

Some people have said that it is likely that AV will produce more proportionate outcomes. I think there are four things to bear in mind here:

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 72 Comments
Fred Carver

Opinion: Making the case for liberal interventionism

By Fred Carver | Sun 18th April 2010 - 11:00 am

I’ve just had the following article published in the “Rhode Island Provident” of all places:

You would be forgiven for having been taken by surprise by the revolution in Kyrgyzstan. A few Scrabble enthusiasts may have been rubbing their hands at the news that (now that Mattel are allowing the use of proper nouns) the tiny mountainous nation in Central Asia will earn you 80 points for just one vowel – more if you can snag a triple word score tile. However, for the most part Kyrgyzstan has been unnoticed by the rest of the world.

It is now the site of

…

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 9 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tanya Park
    @Abrial, there's something right in this. A society where everyone has poor but equal living standards would be a strange kind of success, and focusing purely o...
  • Catherine Crosland
    It's strange that the first ten replies to Matthew's article deal almost exclusively with the social media ban, and not the assisted dying bill which Matthew al...
  • Abrial Jerram
    Our focus should be on ensuring that the lowest living standards in society are sufficient for flourishing, and tax should be levied for that purpose. Imbalance...
  • Abrial Jerram
    I can't understand why all the parties, all of whom face this exact challenge haven't united on this and worked together on this if only out of self interest, s...
  • Abrial Jerram
    Tom Walker the precedent more alarming than us banning young people from social media which is arguably reversible is the precedent (that is much harder to reve...