Author Archives: Simon Oliver

Simon Oliver

Are we in a fracking mess?

By Simon Oliver | Thu 17th March 2016 - 3:12 pm
Over the past few weeks you could be forgiven for assuming that the party is in a bit of a mess on the fracking issue. Nothing could be further from the truth.
The Scottish and Welsh devolved governments both had a moratorium on fracking on the basis of inherent risks in the technology, with unquantified dangers of seismic disturbance and pollution of water tables, as well as (still unaddressed) risks of waste material transport, treatment and disposal. Permitting planning authorities to reject fracking on these grounds is important. Both our Welsh and Scottish parties supported these moratoria. When a moratorium was debated at Westminster before the election, many of the 58 votes against were from the non-government Lib Dems.
However, as many have said, the evidence for these risks being unavoidable is weak. Fracking can be done safely, from a purely technical point of view. The massively over-interpreted RSE report said so.
Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , and | 15 Comments
Simon Oliver

Protecting Nature From The Greed Of Tories

By Simon Oliver | Tue 27th October 2015 - 1:04 pm
Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | 19 Comments
Simon Oliver

Congratulations to the 11,000 new members of Britain’s greenest party

By Simon Oliver | Fri 15th May 2015 - 2:37 pm

The post-election membership surge is an opportunity to renew and refocus our party. We can show off its core values, which have been seen recently only through the distorting glass of coalition policy. The Tories have held us back in the environmental arena more than others, so I want to make my pitch for all members, new and existing, to also consider joining the Green Liberal Democrats

The Green Liberal Democrats is the Associated Organisation I have been privileged to chair for the past couple of years.We exist to:

Ensure that the Liberal Democrats’ proud record of environmental leadership at all levels of government continues
Establish and develop links with the wider green movement
Inform and educate party activists, policymakers, candidates and elected representatives on environmental issues
Support individuals within the party who are advancing the agenda of environmental stewardship and generational justice

We’ve been around a while, as the Liberal Ecology Group founded in 1977 by the late Tony Beamish (pdf) and then the Green Liberal Democrats via a couple of more unweildy titles during the SDP merger.

Continue reading »
Posted in Lib Dem organisations and News | Tagged | 15 Comments
Simon Oliver

Opinion: Britain’s Greenest Party, the Green Party and Environmentalism

By Simon Oliver | Mon 19th January 2015 - 12:58 pm

Green Lib DemsThe Green Party, which I was a member of briefly in the late 80s, has hard left socialist roots and is widely considered both anti-capitalist and paradoxically authoritarian and localist. It has a wide range of policies, all of which take note of environmental concerns (which do not begin and end with climate change, any more than ours do) but only reference those concerns where necessary. Lately it has been adopting a less hard line approach and on many matters, such as human rights, is decidedly liberal.

However in many cases their authoritarian command economy habit overrides any nascent liberal instinct, and their antipathy to technological and/or market solutions means that they throw away over half the toolbox before they even start. Dogma comes before evidence, and articles of faith remain unchallenged and therefore unproven.

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , and | 108 Comments
Simon Oliver

Opinion: The Conflict Of Idealism And Pragmatism

By Simon Oliver | Mon 23rd September 2013 - 12:53 pm

For me, the most valuable parts of Conference were my discussions with a member of the Green Liberal Democrats Exec on her intense disappointment over the votes on nuclear energy, weapons and shale gas fracking.

We discussed the relative contribution of idealism and pragmatism within the party. Her disappointment stemmed from the perceived abandonment of ideals by the party, in that we should be moving firmly away from both fossil fuel extraction and the risks of nuclear energy.

I share those ideals, but I’m a little more pragmatic – some would say jaded. When going from A to Z, you can’t …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | 8 Comments
Simon Oliver

Opinion: Rebalancing taxes – eliminating the carbon externality

By Simon Oliver | Wed 24th August 2011 - 2:53 pm

What I term “The Carbon Externality” is that cost being borne by current and future society as a result of greenhouse gas emissions, being produced over the past century or so at a rate that exceeds the capacity of the planet to absorb them without perceptible harm.

Externality is an accounting/economics term for any cost that is borne by an external party, and therefore not part of the internal cost analysis. It is the fundamental flaw in Friedman economics and why those calling for small government are missing the point.

Government exists to account for and address externalities. Effective regulation of the market reduces or eliminates externalities so that the costs of doing business are increasingly borne by those who benefit from the business, in the form of reduced profits and higher end-user costs. Taxes are the principle mechanism for this.

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 20 Comments
Simon Oliver

Opinion: How the market will decide our energy future

By Simon Oliver | Fri 12th August 2011 - 9:49 am

Recently articles from both the TUC and CBI have bemoaned the burden of increasing energy costs on energy intensive businesses. Both organisations make the rather obvious error in thinking that a carbon price will inevitably drive the cost of energy upwards. In fact, the opposite is true. The stronger the price signal, the faster the market works to balance supply with demand.

The supply of fossil fuels is finite. Conventional oil has already peaked its supply (as admitted by the chief economist of the IEA) and tar sands and fracking are far too damaging to the environment to continue as …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , and | 25 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • Peter Hirst
    Our government either does not understand the niceties of inter-governmental diplomacy or chooses to ignore them. Both are unfortunate when you are dependent on...
  • Katerina Porter
    The great fault is that "screening" is now done in Britain. It used to be done in the original country -in our consulate I think. Presumably this was changed ...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Joe, The r-g relationship was the main thing I remember from reading Piketty's book Capital. I can imagine Warren Mosler saying something like: "So what if...
  • Brad Barrows
    The crux of the issue is to get a clear answer to the question ‘whose responsibility is it to pay for the social care costs of (mainly) elderly people who are...
  • Matt Wardman
    @SimonR I'm not clear how you boost the flow through the same pipes without boosting the pressure. But I have not revisited my gas laws from O level for t...