Baroness Julie Smith writes…The European Peace Project

Peace: the single most important reason for the creation of what we now call the European Union, and the reason it remains so crucial. The European project arose from a clear vision: to make war in Europe ‘materially impossible’, to create enduring peace in a continent long ravaged by war. It is almost impossible to imagine now the devastation that plagued our continent for so long. And that is thanks to the visionary ideas of its founders. A spirit of reconciliation and mutual cooperation among the six founding members was crucial to ensuring Immanuel Kant’s idea of perpetual peace seemed to be a reality.

Of course, many would argue that is NATO that has kept the peace in Europe. It has certainly been important in securing the borders of its European members. During the Cold War the European Community as it was initially known could rely on an American security blanket to protect them from Soviet threats. Yet, within its own borders it was the mutual trust that developed as a result of pooling sovereignty in the areas of coal and steel and then across a wider set of economic policies that ensured member states began to see each other as partners and allies, not potential invaders.

For generations now we have lived secure in the knowledge that our fathers, brothers and sons will not be summoned to fight for our country. Military engagement by the state and by individuals signing up is voluntary, not forced. We have the EU to thank for that.

And it is important to remember that this is a voluntary union, not a forced marriage. Yes, there is a degree of negotiation and compromise involve as happens in any relationship. Ultimately, the UK can decide what role it plays in the EU; it isn’t coerced into action. In the 43 years since the UK joined we have seen our influence wax and wane, mostly dependent on how engaged the government of the day has sought to be.

At times we have led, as in the initiative to ‘complete the internal market’ enshrined in the Single European Act (SEA). Taking down internal barriers to trade, including free movement of goods, capital, services and labour – envisaged in the founding treaties but taken so much further in the 1992 programme – was pushed by Margaret Thatcher, and it achieved a huge amount. When the UK engages we can make a significant difference to the EU, to our mutual benefit; when it takes itself to the side-lines its influence is inevitably reduced.

You don’t have to love all the details of the EU to believe that it has played a crucial role in the peaceful development of first six and now 28 member states, but you do need to be part of that Union to influence and improve it. Being part of the world’s greatest peace project remains a great prize.

This article is from the EuroFile (pdf)– a collection of essays offering a positive, liberal case for Europe

* Julie Smith is a Senior Lecturer in International Relations at the University of Cambridge, a member of the House of Lords and Cambridge City Council

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • The three remainers were very good in the live debate last night but it would have been nice to see Julie Smith, Tim Farron and Caroline Pidgeon do it instead. I can dream can’t I?

  • Eddie Sammon 22nd Jun '16 - 2:06pm

    I agree the EU is good for peace. Imagine if we left and there was another war in Europe in 50 years time or at any point in the future? People will say: well, there were no wars whilst all the main countries were members of the EU and Britain was the country who started its dismantling.

    If we leave the chances of war within Northern Ireland, with the Republic of Ireland and with Spain increase (over Gibraltar). Now, war with our now good friends may seem unthinkable, but if civil wars were happening around Europe less than 100 years ago then who is to say wars between nation states can’t happen again in the future?

    Vote to remain in the European Union tomorrow, Thursday 23rd June.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Paul R
    @Martin Gray - The NR only operates in France and its gains were offset by losses for other far right parties in the EU. The net results in the European Parliam...
  • Paul R
    @Peter Martin - Ignoring the data - in this case of actual election results - to advance a claim is "Cherry picking" of the worst sort. If we are to do that, we...
  • Chris Cory
    @Leekliberal. I’ve heard this old canard many times, that if we didn’t have a monarch we’d have President Johnson/Blair/Farage, but the Irish seem to ha...
  • bob sayer
    On the list of new MPs onparliamentary website( I think) Tim Farron has a photo which is Nigel Farage or a bad picture of Tim...
  • Alex Macfie
    It's not just Farage. Trump and his followers are also trying to link the attack to his opponents. This is despite the suspected attacker being a registered Rep...