Book review – Jack Kennedy: Elusive Hero by Chris Matthews

Books and films about the last second of President John F Kennedy’s life have been plentiful. “Jack Kennedy – Elusive hero” by Chris Matthews is a very engaging book which focusses on the great politician’s life before that last second.

Chris Matthews is a very well-known US TV broadcaster. He prefaces this book in a personal context – explaining his great admiration for JFK. The book does an excellent job in answering the key question which John F Kennedy himself described as the pivotal one for biographies: “What was he like?”

I really enjoyed the tale of Jack Kennedy’s life. I learnt that JFK was certainly not a “yes man” for his fantastically rich father, as has often been assumed. JFK was his own man, as his anti-appeasement (ref. Hitler) stance showed, for example (Joe Kennedy was very pro-appeasement). The book relates that JFK was very, very ill for most of his life. He was given the last rites three times. It transpires that the “ask not” sentence of his inaugural speech was based on what his old school headmaster used to say at school assemblies. Before the second world war, JFK wrote a book called “Why England slept”. This was a best seller and he donated the royalties from the British edition to the reconstruction of Plymouth, Devon after its extensive bombing (a good pub quiz question, is that).

It is noticeable how JFK ensured he had old friends with him whenever he was in danger of being bored or getting lonely. There was a coterie of Boston and old school pals who he kept close to right through to his early death.

I also learnt from Matthews’ book that JFK was not a liberal – he was a moderate. Indeed he was a great supporter of Senator Joe McCarthy and his anti-communist “witch-hunt”. He was also very tough – and could initiate very bullish actions when necessary. Certainly, the book gives a very affectionate account of JFK’s war heroism, which was quite amazing. He was a superb campaigner – I particularly enjoyed the book’s story of JFK winning the Wisconsin primary against Hubert Humprhey.

Often with JFK, one wonders whether he is respected with great awe because he was assassinated at 46 years old. This book describes very convincingly that, in fact, what JFK did in his few short years as President actually well justifies the awed respect in which he is held. The book centrally focusses on his achievement of avoiding nuclear war over the Cuban missile crisis. All his military advisers were strongly telling him to strike back at the Cubans/Russians. It was as if Kennedy’s whole life had been a preparation for that moment. Chris Matthews elegantly summarises why JFK was so good in that crisis:

It was his detachment that saved us. Another man would have reacted with force to the Soviet treachery. He would have shared in the righteousness of the cause, been stirred to attack by the saber rattling. Jack resisted. He was not moved by the emotion of others around him. He knew his course and stayed to it. Thank God. The boy who had read alone of history’s heroes was now safely one of them. He had done it not by winning a war, but averting one far more horrible than any leader in the past could have imagined.

One wonders how President Trump will measure up to such a standard.

* Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist and member of the Liberal Democrat Voice team. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Books.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Richard Underhill 24th Nov '16 - 12:01pm

    Another quiz question: JFK sent a negotiator to Cuba. Fidel Castro gave the negotiator a box of Cuban cigars to take back to the US President. They were impounded by US Customs because of US sanctions on Cuba. The White House negotiator asked “What are you going to do with them?”
    Answer: “Burn them.”
    “Yes, I know”, said the negotiator “One by one”.

  • Lorenzo Cherin 26th Nov '16 - 6:21pm

    Everything good here , but the mistaken comment , Paul, that President Kennedy “was not a Liberal but a moderate “. In American modern parlance liberal means left wing , Paul, you know that . Jack Kennedy made a speech to the Liberal Party of New York , on you tube , google and its there, making it very clear that if you mean Liberal as we do , he was one !

    To mention the wicthhunt as evidence otherwise , is a red , no pun intended , herring . His father was friendly with the awful Macarthy , and RFK keen , as a younger man . JFK was a product of the time and his background.

    His ahievements and self described philosophy and personal life make him a Liberal liberal !

  • Lorenzo Cherin 26th Nov '16 - 6:57pm

    Yes, Paul , would like to, am wary of too many of the modern appraisals , one a few years ago called JFK Conservative , drove me potty just in the title , the argument not much better!

    If we are all mixtures, then we are not always what any one definition defines as . My view , over many years of reading about the life and work of my favourite President , is he was a Liberal Democrat in the way the traditions of British and European Liberalism mean it .

    Have you ever heard his exraordinary speech , on the subject , if not do check it out as mentioned, and go to the Kennedy Library site online , Paul if you haven’t .

    I know , like me , you are an admirer of the Kennedys all three bros !

  • Richard Underhill 26th Nov '16 - 10:05pm

    Fidel Castro dies.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • tom arms
    Alan Jeffs, I don't have an exhaustive, but out of the following countries: Kenya, Zambia, South Africa, Mozambique, Nigeria, Ghana, Botswana, Senegal, Tanzania...
  • Simon R
    Interesting idea. It would though effectively amount to loans, which would therefore place developing countries even more in debt - and there are still ongoing...
  • Alan Jelfs
    The problem with your scheme is that the developing world has a nasty habit of not paying its debts....
  • Peter Hirst
    This is a fine idea, though being outside the EU I don't see how it can be easily achieved. We should also work with our european allies to understand in the r...
  • Tom Arms
    There are several such charities. I myself donated to one which built a school in Gambia for 300 children. It was organised by one person who basically built an...