Why I’m not celebrating over Brian Coleman

Highly controversial Conservative London Assembly Member Brian Coleman is in the news again, though this time it’s not for an outrageous expense claim or the like.

The Barnet Standards Board has ruled that he broke the rulesfor sending an email that called the blogger Roger Tichbourne “an obsessive, poisonous individual”.

I’m not exactly over-joyed at the outcome. Yes, Brian Coleman has once again behaved stupidly. Yes, he deserves criticism. But should such matters really be up for standards boards to rule on? I don’t think so. Let the actions of politicians be public and then let the voters or (if it’s a matter of the law) the police decide. There’s also libel law and a special legal provision against false statements about election candidates. This case does nothing to convince me that we need something beyond that to judge on whether politicians’s words are appropriate.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • Talking about expense claims has Lord Rennard repaid the taxpayer the £ 41,000 he claimed for a second home?

  • So what should Standards Committees (not Boards) rule on, Mark? It is all very well leaving everything to “the political process” You can see in the HoC where that has led.

  • John Zim, according to the Sunday Times, it’s Labour and Tories who should be worried about their peer’s expences.

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarIan 17th Feb - 9:48am
    This looks good - if rather large and potentially unwieldy. Do we have anything on process and timescale?
  • User AvatarAdrian Mark Sanders 17th Feb - 9:45am
    @Thomas I don't think we are in any disagreement although I would be interested in an expanse of what economic patriotism really means. I'm certainly...
  • User AvatarIan 17th Feb - 9:43am
    Hopefully this is good news. Just remember that most of the idiotic decisions of the 2019 campaign surely went through the same committee - not...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 17th Feb - 8:55am
    @Geoffrey Dron So, you mean “Common Market, Yes and European Superstate, No”? I would buy that and I reckon that a majority of Brits and...
  • User AvatarGlenn 17th Feb - 8:54am
    Barrry Lofty Britain will still exist in 5 years time. Firstly, the Tories will not sanction another Scottish referendum and secondly, despite all claims otherwise,...
  • User AvatarGeoffrey Dron 17th Feb - 8:19am
    LDs should say that they support the UK rejoining a Europe des patries but reject federalim. That might have traction in the UK (assuming Scotland...