Bring back Nads!

It’s been quite a week for Nadine Dorries, the eccentric Tory Cornerstoner MP for Mid-Bedfordshire. Yesterday she earned copious media coverage for her suggestion that MPs are on ‘suicide watch’ for their Parliamentary colleagues amidst the “unbearable” Westminster atmosphere sparked by the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses allegations.

But when reading her blog, it wasn’t that part which most caught my attention – it was this part:

… this country has never had a Prime Minister with the political courage to stand up to the British media, and award MPs the pay rise proposed year after year, by the Senior Salary Review Board. Year after year the salary stayed the same; but the allowances were increased, were called allowances, not expenses, and MPs were told to use them. … no Prime Minister should ever have the power to use MPs’ pay as a political pawn. Hopefully the good which will come from this will be radical reform, which will prevent such a disaster ever occurring again.

So, you see, according to Nadine Dorries, it’s all Gordon’s fault MPs were forced to make questionable expenses claims – MPs such as Nadine herself who appears more than a little confused as to where she lives most of the time. (For a dissection of her claims, see Tim Ireland’s Bloggerheads here, here and here.) If only Gordon Brown had led a popular crusade to increase MPs’ pay, none of this would have happened, says Nadine.

Thing is, Nadine, it’s not all Gord’s fault. For sure, he’s most to blame – though not because, as you state, he’s left MPs impoverished by refusing to incease your pay. Rather he’s to blame because he is, after all, Prime Minister, which gives him a fair amount of power to make Parliament fairer and more transparent, an opportunity he’s constantly shrugged off. But there was an opportunity to introduce radical reform of MPs’ expenses in July last year, and – guess what? – it was rejected by the combined forces of 146 Labour MPs and 21 Conservative MPs. You can see HERE the full list of Nadine’s colleagues who voted to leave the system intact. For the record, all Lib Dem MPs present voted for reform.

Today, I see Nadine’s blog has been taken down, after she flung round some unsubstantiated rumours about the Barclay Brothers, owners of the Telegraph group. (You can still read the Google cache of her blog here, if you want to see what it’s all about.) And that’s a shame, a real shame, for two reasons.

First, the claims she makes about the Barclay Brothers could easily have been challenged by them without resorting to heavy-handed legal injunctions. It’s a rather pathetic, bullying way of dealing with such allegations. And secondly, and at least as importantly, Nadine’s increasingly bizarre blog-postings have greatly added to the gaiety of the blogosphere in the past week. To deprive the rest of us the joy of reading her contorted witterings is just bad form.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • John Marriott
    @Peter Martin My answer to your question is “The Federal Republic of Germany”. I’d even go as far as accepting a President; but I know that this cherry o...
  • John Marriott
    Joe Bourke’s reference to the Canadian Tax system reminds me of the three years my wife and I spent working in Alberta back in the early 1970s. Calculating yo...
  • Nonconformistradical
    "If voter impersonation were significant there would be many cases of voters turning up to be told they had already voted. Also there would likely be many cases...
  • Andrew Tampion
    George Thomas is right to say that it is bizarre to argue that because there is no evidence of current voter fraud that is not a reason to improve the security ...
  • Mark Morris
    worth noting some specific concerns and recommendations made by RNIB: https://www.rnib.org.uk/campaigning/priority-campaigns/voting-and-elections/turned-out-20...