Byelection results – 24 October

The Lib Dems gained one seat at yesterday’s county, district and unitary byelections.

Congratulations to Eric Seward who held North Walsham East for the Lib Dems with a decent 5.8% rise in votes.

North Walsham result

The Conservatives held:

  • Havant: Waterloo – David Crichton increased the Lib Dem vote by 12.4%
  • West Sussex: Warnham and Rusper – Lib Dems down 7.9%
  • Teignbridge: Bovey – Lib Dems up 1%.

Labour gained:

  • Charnwood: Shepshed West from the Conservatives with a 9.4% swing, the Lib Dems losing 7.4%.

Labour also held:

  • Charnwood: Loughborough Hastings – Lib Dems up 2.9%
  • Wigan: Winstanley – the very small Lib Dem vote up 1%
  • Wirral: Upton – Lib Dems up 0.4%.

In Scotland, Labour held:

  • South Lanarkshire: Hamilton South – no Lib Dem candidate
  • Fife: Dunfermline South – Lib Dems down 4.9%.

Detailed results are available from ALDC.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • So we didn’t actually “gain” a seat then? (Not taking anything away from a very successful defence).

  • paul barker 25th Oct '13 - 9:19pm

    The ALDC site lists 10 byelections for yesterday. The Libdem vote rose in 5 & fell in 3. Thats quite a good result surely, given the increased level of competition from UKIP.
    For comparison, The Labour vote rose in 4 of the contests & fell in 5.

  • George Kendall 25th Oct '13 - 9:21pm
  • “The ALDC site lists 10 byelections for yesterday. The Libdem vote rose in 5 & fell in 3. Thats quite a good result surely, given the increased level of competition from UKIP.”

    I believe all these seats were last contested in 2011-1013. Given that the party’s poll rating has been more or less static since late 2010 it’s not surprising that the percentage would rise and fall in similar numbers of seats. But probably all the results above except Havant would represent a substantial fall compared with pre-coalition levels.

  • George Kendall – yes, I know we gained a town council seat. But the article above says “The Lib Dems gained one seat at yesterday’s country, district and unitary byelections”, and that is not true.

  • Peter Watson 25th Oct '13 - 11:38pm

    @paul barker “The Libdem vote rose in 5 & fell in 3.”
    Of the five byelections in which the vote rose, two were picking up 19 and 26 votes in seats which did not have a Lib Dem candidate before. Since that is little more than a friends and family vote, I suspect that you may be reading a little too much into it.

  • Patrick Coleman 26th Oct '13 - 2:23am

    we did gain a Cirencester Town Council seat from the Conservatives as well on Thursday in a double vacancy by- election (in effect we gained 2 seats, as one vacancy was due to the resignation of a former LibDem-turned-independent councillor):
    Nigel Robbins Lib Dem 300
    Patrick Coleman Lib Dem 251
    Tory 207
    Labour 130.

    Cirencester TC is now 13 LD, 1 Con, 1 Ind

  • Andy Boddington 26th Oct '13 - 8:12am

    Thanks for the comments. I’d be interested in your views on the way we report byelections.

    It is not my intention, as Lib Dem Voice Friday editor, to provide a full results service. We can leave that to ALDC and others. I want to highlight points of interest, wins, losses and exceptional performances. I always want to applaud those that have done well and won seats.

    It takes some time to check and compile the results – that can compete with pressure to get other articles posted. And also with the demands of my full time job as a writer and editor.

    So I’d prefer a ‘lite’ rather than a full fat publication of results. But without all the detail perhaps we are missing points – for example, sometimes a large swing is based on very few votes.

    In the back of my mind is whether we might develop a local results tracker that looks at trends over time. But I need to think about how best to do that. Perhaps you have some ideas.

    We also need to report town council results. I think these might best be encouraged in the comments thread. Again, your views would be appreciated.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 30th May - 12:14pm
    Peter Martin, it is good to see the Labour party adopting the Resolution Foundation proposals and socialists like Christine Berry finally understanding that a country...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 30th May - 11:58am
    Peter Martin/Thomas, as so often the argument starts with a false premise and Richard Murphy must know this. A +/- 1% target for current spending...
  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 30th May - 11:49am
    " What increasingly troubles me is that some dialogue by obvious humans, gives every impression of being a machine" And sometimes such a machine might...
  • User AvatarPeter Hirst 30th May - 11:39am
    There is a case for bringing the nursing home system back within the public purse. This would enable more uniform policies, cost savings from economy...
  • User AvatarPeter Hirst 30th May - 11:21am
    Concerning your last issue, Mark one item whoever is considering our messaging might want to consider is broadening it to include what sort of politics...
  • User AvatarDilettante Eye 30th May - 11:10am
    Maybe we have to accept that any new economic orthodoxy will be run by machines? The Turing test attempts to validate the reality behind a...