Stephen Tall

Cameron’s confusion over Tory marriage tax plans

By | Mon 4th January 2010 - 5:40 pm

It can be hard pre-launching an election campaign, can’t it? Here’s the PoliticsHome rolling news front page from today:

At 3.04 pm, the site reported:

David Cameron said he could not guarantee a Conservative government would be able to offer a tax break to married couples, despite having personally supported such a move. “It’s something within a parliament I would definitely hope to do,” he said, but insisted the state of the public finances prevented him from offering any guarantee. “We’re not able to give people absolute certainty on everything,” he said.


By 4.50 pm, the state of the nation’s finances had clearly improved, for Mr Cameron was able to declare:

The Conservatives will “definitely” bring in measures to recognise marriage in the tax system, David Cameron has confirmed. The Tory leader was forced to clarify his position after earlier giving an interview in which he said that he could not promise with “absolutely certainty” to deliver the policy if he won the general election. This afternoon the party issued a statement to the BBC from Mr Cameron in which he said recognising marriage in the tax system was something he felt “very strongly about”. “It’s something we will definitely do in the next parliament,” he said.

So, that’s two definite Tory tax plans we do know about: inheritance tax cuts for millionaires, and tax breaks for married couples. Yes, everyone, the Tories really have changed. No, really.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • tony hill 4th Jan '10 - 5:50pm

    Yet another reason not to give a moment’s consideration to supporting a Tory government in the event of a hung parliament.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Cassie
    'Knee jerk adoption.. (be it mutuals instead of corporates) does not address the fundamental strategic problems'. Indeed. Dŵr Cymru Welsh Water is not-for-pro...
  • Peter Chambers
    I would like to agree that the "It" is the Royal Navy. But I cannot. The necessary "It" is Social Democracy. The National Preparedness Commission said in the...
  • Rif Winfield
    Whatever the multiple roles which the Navy must undertake (and here I fully agree with you, Edward), what is essential is the quantity of vessels. However effec...
  • Nick Baird
    @Jana - there is a huge difference between the relatively confined space of the Black Sea (and the Azov Sea in particular) and the North Atlantic where the area...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Might the "Future of War "and its present state also be affected by decisions relating to deciding who are the actual enemies? Might the Russia-Ukrains war b...