Can you help Ken Livingstone with his maths?

Ken Livingstone is currently running for a third term as London Mayor. Pre-2000 he said, “I would not seek to serve more than one term”.

Is the number three greater than, the same, or less than one? Discuss.

(Hat tip: Benedict Brogan for the quote)

In other London election news, tomorrow (Friday) is Brian Paddick’s Facebook Friday (as explained by Duncan Borrowman and Lynne Featherstone) whilst today Brian Paddick has been criticising Boris Johnson over crime and the BBC has this new profile of Brian.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in London.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Interesting piece on the Lib Dem chances of taking the mayoralty here:

    http://donalblaney.blogspot.com/2008/02/brian-paddick-talentless-desperate_01.html

  • No. Ken kept his word. He served Londoners well for one term. After that there has been no more nonsense about serving anyone, or about looking after people who are not his friends and acolytes.

  • 1. Letters from a Tory – it was senior staff in the Mayor’s Office – NOT the London Assembly – that were asked by the Mayor to campaign for him. Small but important distinction.

    As to Ken’s remarks about not standing for more than one term, what hasn’t been commented on is that in the same submission -a response to a Government consultation – Ken added that he was against the idea of an executive Mayor because “as has been shown in America eventually all Mayors become corrupt.”

    You have to give it to Mr Livingstone – he is remarkably good at predicting the future:-)

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Rose Runswick
    Thank you for saying this, international law is our best hope for a fairer and more peaceful world, I worry the memory of why it came about in the first place i...
  • Tristan Ward
    Sanctions should absolutely continue, but the idea that Britain should not rearm is to repeat the mistakes of the 1930s. Appeasement is not an option....
  • Katharine Pindar
    Paul Barker: you are right, Paul, in the wider world we do seem largely invisible. That was for instance clear in today's Laura Kuennsberg show when, you could ...
  • tom arms
    The first known use of the phrase "May you live in interesting times" was towards the end of the 19th century when Joseph Chamberlain used it in several speech...
  • Andy Daer
    John is, of course, right to remind us all of the need to uphold international law. Today we've seen Trump congratulate the man he had previously distanced h...