Category Archives: Parliament

Anything connected with business in the Houses of Commons or Lords (eg, PMQs).

Nick Clegg supports the “Free Our bills” campaign

Free Our Bills is campaigning to get information about legislation passing through Parliament available in a sensible electronic format, so that it can more easily be made use of and publicised on the internet.

Nick Clegg has now given the campaign his full support:

Parliament belongs to the people. It’s time to open it up so people can find out what’s going on. mySociety has done a brilliant job in recent years in doing that – and it’s time to take this project to the next level and get information about the laws Parliament passes into the public domain.

It takes

Also posted in News | Tagged and | Leave a comment

Further to this week’s PMQs on housing repossessions…

…it appears from this report in the FT that the Prime Minister didn’t so much provide correct figures in answer to Nick Clegg’s questions as, er, provide made-up ones:

Mr Clegg said house prices were falling faster than at the start of the last property crash.

He quoted Ministry of Justice figures showing that more than 95,000 orders to repossess properties were made last year – a fraction below the 103,000 orders made in 1990 at the start of the last housing crash.

Mr Brown replied that there were only 27,000 repossessions made last year, against 200,000 in the first two years of the 1990s.

But

Also posted in News and PMQs | 2 Comments

Clegg calls for MPs’ expenses to be published (UPDATED)

From a party news release:

The Liberal Democrats have today written to the Commons Speaker asking when the detailed breakdown of MPs’ expenses will now be published.

Commenting Liberal Democrat Leader, Nick Clegg, said:

“There are legitimate grounds for appealing the decision to publish private addresses. However, there is no earthly reason why the rest of the information should not be published immediately.

“Any delay will only add to the British public’s distrust in their politicians.”

Update:
Coverage in The Times:

The Speaker of the Commons is facing a revolt over his decision to fight the release of MPs expenses in the High Court after

Also posted in News | Tagged | 9 Comments

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on home repossessions

Both Nick Clegg and David Cameron tackled Gordon Brown on the consequences of the credit crunch for the economy. The Tory leader focused on the regulatory failures which allowed Northern Rock to become such a mess; the Lib Dem leader tackled the Prime Minister on home repossessions and the current ‘boom and bust’ in the housing market. Tick to Nick for picking the issue which matters most to the public.

The Prime Minister shaded his confrontation with Mr Cameron, looking pretty comfortable on his home turf of the economy, while unusually the Tory leader relied heavily on his notes for his over-long questions. Jonathan Calder at Liberal England is pretty scathing of Dave’s performance today:

… he is clearly not a master of the economics brief. His questions were wordy and Gordon Brown was armed with some good quotes to answer him. Whatever the rights and wrongs of Cameron’s case over the Financial Services Agency, you have to score the contest to Brown.

David Cameron’s second problem is that he is, er, David Cameron. The only time he threatened to engage public interest today was when he talked of the price of bread, milk and eggs. Yet if ever someone gave the impression of not knowing how much bread, milk and eggs cost, that person is David Cameron.

I always wondered, in a society where being “posh” is just about the worst sin out, if David Cameron’s background – and even more the fact that he looks like a public school boy – would count against him. This is one issue where it will.

Nick is looking more and more comfortable at PMQs as the weeks go by. He hasn’t tried to ‘do a Vince’, and skewer Gordon with a smart quip, but he is sticking doggedly to his task of interrogating the Prime Minister on the serious issues of the day with his two questions. Which, after all, is what PMQs is supposed to be for. Anyway, judge for yourselves… the Hansard text of their exchange is below:

Also posted in News and PMQs | Tagged , and | 1 Comment

MPs for sale?

That’s the question posed by a new piece of academic research which shows just how much richer Conservative (though not Labour) MPs have ended up by the time they died:

While the role of money in policymaking is a central question in political economy research, surprisingly little attention has been given to the rents politicians actually derive from politics. We use both matching and a regression discontinuity design to analyze an original dataset on the estates of recently deceased British politicians. We find that serving in Parliament roughly doubled the wealth at death of Conservative MPs

Also posted in News | 3 Comments

How online are British MPs?

The UK Parliament’s website lists email and website details for all the current MPs. A series of spots checks shows the data to look accurate (though of course there may be one or two errors in there somewhere). So I’ve been counting. And then, of course, I’ve drawn three barcharts.

They show in turn, what percentage of Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs:

  1. Have no public email address provided on the Parliament website (there’s no Lib Dem bar, because they all have one),
  2. Have no website addresses listed on the Parliament website (and Parliament is reasonably generous at listing sites that are really sub-sites

Also posted in Online politics | 6 Comments

Post Office closures – Labour majority slashed as 11 Tories go AWOL

The Government narrowly avoided an embarrassing defeat in the Commons last night of their plans to close 2,500 post offices – Labour’s majority was reduced to just 20, with Lib Dems and Tories voting together.

Sarah Teather led the Lib Dem attacks on the closure programme– you can follow her arguments in Hansard here (and an extract of her Commons speech is copied below).

The Government majority would have been even tighter, of course, if the Tory leader, David Cameron, and 10 other Conservative MPs had turned up to vote. But as the Daily Mail’s Ben Brogan notes on his blog, the point of the Tory motion was not to reverse Labour’s post office closures – to do that, the Tories would need to have an alternative proposal for saving them. Which they don’t:

This was an Opposition Day Debate, after all. Nothing was at stake, save Government pride. To call this a rebellion is to give it more credence than it deserves. After all, if it had really mattered, David Cameron would have turned up to vote along with – by my count – 10 other Tories who were somehow absent from their own show. If they had, the PM’s majority would have been down to single figures. Pointless, yes, but worth having on the score sheet. Mr Duncan said tonight: “The hunt will now be on for all those Labour MPs who have pretended to support their local post office and then done a runner when they had a chance to make a real difference.” But what about the Tories who missed “a chance to make a real difference”? As I say, a jolly wheeze, but that’s all it was.

The division list from last night’s debate can be found here – worth looking through to see if your local Labour MP stuck to party lines last night.

And here, as promised, is an excerpt from Sarah’s speech:

Also posted in News | 9 Comments

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on the Gurkhas and Iraq

The Lib Dem leader used his two questions to Gordon Brown today to highlight the issue of Gurkha soldiers who served this country being denied British citizenship; and then to ask Gordon Brown if he has any regrets about signing the cheques that paid for the Iraq war.

Two very serious issues, and as has become his custom very punchily delivered by Nick. Indeed, the level of loutish barracking to which he’s subjected by Labour and Tory MPs is an indication that his questions are hitting home – the Lib Dems’ opponents are very keen to ensure his sure-footed performances are interrupted as much as possible to make it more difficult for them to be broadcast on the news.

(Ironically, I heard a BBC journalist mention on the radio that Nick was “struggling to make himself heard” in the Commons – as if that reflected negatively on him, rather than the ill manners of those who shout out to drown him out).

Following Vince Cable’s star turns at PMQs was always going to be a tough act. It’s considerably to Nick’s credit that he’s done it seamlessly, but in his own style.

Anyway, Hansard’s record is reprinted below, so judge for yourselves:

Also posted in News and PMQs | Tagged and | 2 Comments

Lords reform one year on

A year on from a House of Commons vote on Lords Reform, we asked Baroness Ros Scott about the prospect of the Commons getting its way.

When I was asked about going to the Lords, I was warned that I might not be there for long.  That was 8 years ago, and I’m not convinced that we’re much nearer to reforming the Lords than we were then.

There is a general consensus in the Commons that something needs to be done to democratise the second chamber, but a range of views about exactly what that should be.  Voting on the Cunningham …

Also posted in News | Leave a comment

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on Europe

This was always going to be a tricky Prime Minister’s Questions for Nick Clegg, given the delight both Labour and the Tories take in ganging up on the Lib Dems in Parliament. In fact, as in previous weeks, Nick easily withstood the yelling and abuse from the other benches, and was able to ask clear and punchy questions on the subject of the week: Europe.

Fairness demands I note that Gordon Brown is improving at PMQs – his reponses to Nick were pretty sharp, and he also seems to be getting the measure of David Cameron in their sparring sessions. Judge for yourselves below.

Also posted in Europe / International, News and PMQs | Tagged | 2 Comments

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on mental health

Unsurprisingly, today’s PMQs couldn’t quite match up to the excitement of yesterday’s Parliamentary proceedings – or indeed the rooftop excitements. Davd Cameron suffered from poor briefing in his questions on Parliamentary proceedings, and was left deflated by an on-form Prime Minister. Meanwhile, Nick Clegg put in one of his strongest PMQs performances to date, shrugging off the expected barracking of Labour and Tory MPs following yesterday’s Euro referendum walk-out, and focusing on a crucial but under-reported issue: mental health.

Here’s the Hansard version so you can judge for yourselves:

Also posted in News and PMQs | Tagged | Leave a comment

Is Nick Clegg right to back the Speaker?

The House of Commons Speaker, Michael Martin, has found himself in the full glare of unwelcome publicity this weekend, following allegations that he has misused his Parliamentary allowances:

In the past two weeks it has emerged that some black cab trips made by Mr Martin’s wife to buy food were claimed on expenses, that allowances were claimed for a home he owns outright in Scotland, and that he used air miles earned on official business to buy first-class tickets for some relatives to fly to London over the New Year.”

As none of this is outside the rules it might not …

Also posted in News | Tagged , and | 8 Comments

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on Northern Rock and energy prices

After last week’s half-term break, there were few surprises at today’s Prime Minister’s Questions: the Lib Dems’ Nick Clegg was able confidently to lead with Labour’s mishandling of the Northern Rock collapse (thanks to Vince Cable’s far-sighted statements), while Tory leader David Cameron (who, with George Osbourne, has been all over the place on the issue) avoided mentioning it in his first round of questions.

Nick followed up – after a pointed dig at the Tories’ “economic illiteracy” – with a ‘bread and butter’ question on energy prices, something which is fast becoming his trademark.

Here’s the Hansard transcript of their exchange:

Also posted in News and PMQs | Tagged | Leave a comment

Derek Conway: still getting an extra £13,000 a year

The Independent has the story:

The disgraced Conservative MP Derek Conway will keep his place among a group of MPs paid a £13,000-a-year bonus for chairing parliamentary proceedings. Mr Conway’s political career was apparently in ruins after he was suspended from the Commons after being criticised for employing his son as a researcher.

But he has retained a prestigious and lucrative position as a member of the “chairmen’s panel” appointed by the Speaker Michael Martin to oversee detailed debates on Bills…

Norman Baker, Liberal Democrat MP for Lewes, said: “I find it very surprising he is still in that position and nobody

Also posted in News | Tagged | 2 Comments

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on Labour’s ‘surveillance state’

After this week’s controversy about bugging of MPs, Nick Clegg used his two questions to the Prime Minister to ask directly about Labour’s desperate efforts to keep tabs on every man, woman and child in the country. In particular, Nick focused on the fingerprinting of children at school, and demanded the Prime Minister stop the practise – a question Mr Brown preferred to ignore.

Meanwhile, the Tory leader’s PMQs’ increasingly shrill performance has become the focus this week of some criticism from the BBC’s Nick Robinson:

The leader who promised an end to ‘Punch and Judy’ has become more and more contemptuous in his attitude to the PM and, as a result, less respectful towards the office itself. … I recall David Cameron telling Tories to be aware that whatever they said would, in the end, tell voters as much about them as the person they were attacking. Has he forgotten this or am I missing something?

There’s no doubting that Mr Cameron is quick on his feet, and well able to riposte with a barbed insult. Yet this poison-tongued smoothness – combined with some glib questions and the full-throated braying of the Tory ranks – can produce a fairly unedifying spectacle which does nothing to make Dave look Prime Ministerial. His advisors would do well to steer him away from lines like today’s rather pathetic playground crack, “I think the Prime Minister had been practising that soundbite all week, and do you know what? It is still rubbish.”

Anyway, read for yourself below how Nick got on this week:

Also posted in News and PMQs | Tagged and | 4 Comments

Was Greg Mulholland right to call Ivan Lewis “an a*******”? Abso-bloody-lutely.

We’ll let the Daily Mail set the scene:

The image of politicians has taken a further dive after a Liberal Democrat MP called a minister an “a***hole”. Greg Mulholland stormed out after making the remark during a fiery debate about the problems of funding hospices. The party health spokesman was furious after Labour frontbencher Ivan Lewis refused three times to let him intervene in the discussion.

The Voice, having read the debate in Hansard in full, is firmly of the opinion that Ivan Lewis was indeed “an a******”, and that, if anything, the Lib Dem MP for Leeds North-West let him off lightly. So you can judge for yourselves, below we’ve reproduced the text of Greg’s speech which sparked the now famous fiery exchange:

20 Comments

Cameron’s PMQs’ cock-up

Oh dear… Dave didn’t do his homework – Ben Brogan has more:

At PMQs yesterday Mr Cameron challenged Gordon Brown about his reluctance to ban from the country Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi: “He was banned by a former Conservative Home Secretary, so why won’t the Government ban him?”

All well and good, except that a few minutes later Michael Howard admitted to Andrew Neil that he had allowed Mr Qaradawi into the country five times while he was Home Secretary – at least once while Mr Cameron was his special adviser. You see the embarrassment? The initial response from Dave’s office was

Also posted in PMQs | Leave a comment

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on armed forces’ living conditions

Another week, more focus by Nick Clegg on domestic bread ‘n’ butter issues during his exchange with the Prime Minister at the weekly PMQs: this time taking Gordon Brown to task for the poor conditions of the British armed forces’ living conditions.

The spectres of the last week’s sleaze allegations – Labour’s Peter Hain and the Tories’ Derek Conway – were both absent from the exchanges between Mr Brown and David Cameron. The encounter seemed a score-draw to me: while Gordon lacked finesse, Dave lacked gravitas.

Nick continues to do well: focused questions, punchily delivered. At the moment he’s still sticking to his script, which is far enough while he finds his feet and gets the measure of the occasion. It also works better for media soundbites. But it would be good to see him respond directly in his second follow-up question to Mr Brown’s habitual put-downs of ‘the Liberal party’, and our economic policies – the Government’s mishandling of Northern Rock (and Vince’s assured credibility) gives him just that opportunity.

Anyway, here’s the exchange in full, as recorded by Hansard. If you like, you can watch PMQs in full here.

Also posted in News and PMQs | Tagged | 3 Comments

What should an MP do if they sign an EDM? Encore

Well, well. It seems to be a trend.

First we had Labour MP David Anderson signing an EDM (Parliamentary petition) against something but voting for it in Parliament.

And now we have Labour MP Jim Dobbin who signed EDM 317: “That this House is concerned that the Government’s decision to withdraw funding from the institutions for equivalent or lower qualification students will have a disproportionate impact on the part-time sector in general and on specific institutions such as Birkbeck and the Open University…”

But when there was a vote in Parliament on the very same point what did he do? Well, having …

Also posted in News | Leave a comment

What should an MP do if they sign an EDM?

If an MP signs an EDM opposing something and then that very something comes up for vote in Parliament, what do you think they should do?

I think it’s safe to say your answer to that is different from the answer you’d get from Labour MP David Anderson.

Note: EDMs are “early day motions”, a form of Parliamentary petition which MPs can sign.

Leave a comment

PMQs: Nick sticks it to Gordon on Northern Rock

Both Nick Clegg and David Cameron tackled Gordon Brown on the Northern Rock crisis at Prime Minister’s Questions.

The Tory leader got in a good line against the PM’s protestations that putting the bank into administration would lead to a fire sale of the assets: “Does he not understand that administration and liquidation are different things? Let me put it this way. Administration is what the Government are in at the moment; liquidation is what is going to happen by the British people at the next election.” But the Tories’ taunts are blunted by the fact that their policy on Northern Rock has changed almost as often as the Government’s – a point the PM plugged away at to good effect.

Nick borrowed one of Vince’s bon mots when it was his turn to put Gordon on the spot, asking why Labour was nationalising the risks and privatising the profits in its proposed rescue package. In his follow-up, Nick accused the Prime Minister of “running scared of the Conservatives” by ruling out nationalisation. He’s right, of course, but the line delighted Tories rather too much. Perhaps better to have stuck to the argument that the PM’s fear of losing his reputation for prudence is costing the taxpayer dear.

Anyway, here’s the exchange in full, as recorded by Hansard:

Also posted in News and PMQs | Tagged | 2 Comments

Official: UK voting system “open to fraud”

What has Europe ever done for us? Well, that question was partially answered today: it can expose the Labour Government’s connivance in creating a British electoral system which is open to fraud.

That was the startling conclusion of a report issued today by a committee of the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, which states starkly:

it is clear that the electoral system in Great Britain is open to electoral fraud. This vulnerability is mainly the result of the, rather arcane, system of voter registration without personal identifiers. It was exacerbated by the introduction of postal voting on demand, especially under

Also posted in News | Tagged | 6 Comments

EU treaty referendum: the Davey defence

I’ll readily confess to remaining uncomfortable with the Lib Dem position on opposing holding a referendum on the EU reform treaty. I do not like to see banner headlines on the BBC News Politics website proclaiming: Lib Dems oppose referendum vote.

It does not sit well with the widely-proclaimed belief of both candidates during the leadership contest that the party needed to become more spiky, anti-establishment, and to put the people – not politicians – in control of their own lives. Nor does it sit well with our previous, principled stance (alone among the three mainstream parties) that the Maastricht treaty should be subjected to a popular vote. On principle, and in campaigning terms, I think the party has made a mistake.

However, credit where it’s due to Ed Davey, our new shadow foreign secretary, who put forward a trenchant and persuasive argument in last night’s House of Commons debate on the Lisbon treaty. Read it for yourself, and judge it for yourself…

Also posted in Europe / International and News | Tagged and | 97 Comments

What Vince said next

The Voice has already pinned up the party’s press release today with Vince Cable’s serious and pithy response to the Labour Government’s latest attempt to hurl taxpayers’ cash at market speculators. The Lib Dem shadow chancellor, who has utterly outclassed his Labour and Tory counterparts throughout the crisis, contributed his words of wisdom today in the Commons, too – we thought they were worth sharing:

Also posted in News | 4 Comments

Defending Council Housing

Next Tuesday delegates from throughout the country will meet in the House of Commons to take part in an evidence session organised by the group, Defend Council Housing. This coincides with the Committee Stage of the Housing Bill and is designed to help lobby the Government over its continued discrimination against those authorities who have retained the management of Council Housing as a result of tenants’ wishes.

These 140 local authorities, plus the 60 ALMOs (Alms-Length Management Organisations), will continue to be discriminated against if the Housing Bill passes in its current form. Now that the Government has suddenly awoken to the housing crisis they have presided over it would be perverse if they were to continue to discriminate against half the authority areas in England on the basis that their tenants had ‘voted the wrong way’ in stock transfer ballots.

In Parliament in the past both Blair and Brown have told me that “I should celebrate ‘choice’ over this issue.” I do – but nearly half of all Council tenants have democratically chosen NOT to opt for privatisation. No one has yet been able to explain to me why, as a result of exercising their democratic choice, 10,000 Council tenants in an area like Chesterfield should therefore have £4 million of their rents and further millions of Right-to-Buy receipts stolen away by Gordon Brown this year. Especially when a ‘stock transfer’ landlord would immediately be allowed by Gordon to retain all that money for re-investment into Chesterfield social housing.

It is essential that we do not fall victim to the spin that heralded Gordon Brown’s new-found commitment to social housing. It cannot hide the 10 years of abject neglect of social housing under this Labour Government. The Labour manifesto of 1997 lambasted the Conservatives’ woeful record on social housing, but things have got worse not better, and the continuing neglect has left over 1.6 million families on waiting lists – a 63% increase since Labour came to power.

6 Comments

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on home repossessions

Nick Clegg continued where his debut last week left off – focusing on the ‘bread and butter’ issues that affect the lives of everyday folk. Two good solid questions, both dodged by Gordon Brown, who crow-barred in a ham-fisted reference to the ‘Calamity Clegg’ dossier (to the crowing delight of Labour backbenchers) – ensuring it was in answer to the second question, so there was no opportunity for Nick to respond.

Anyway, here’s the exchange in full as recorded by Hansard – you can watch the encounter here on the BBC website here, or listen to it on The Guardian website here.

Also posted in News and PMQs | Tagged | 4 Comments

Clegg on Prime Minister’s Questions

The Guardian interviewed Nick Clegg down a dodgy quality digital line for one of their regular podcasts.  An excerpt appeared at in Thursday’s “Newsdesk” broadcast and the full interview is also available separately here.

Clegg makes clear he wants to use PMQs to test the PM on the issues that matter to real families and confesses that Vince Cable was a hard act to follow.

Also posted in PMQs and Podcasts | 1 Comment

Clegg’s first PMQs (UPDATED)

Prime Minister’s Questions has just started. Use this thread to post up your comments…

Brown and Cameron play the ID cards shuffle: Brown is in favour, but Cameron quotes Darling having been against them; Cameron is against, but Brown quotes one of his Shadow Cabinet (Pauline Neville-Jones) having been for them. No prizes for guessing which is the party that can claim consistent opposition.

Clegg goes on fuel prices. He’s in a different place from that used by Campbell – sitting two places further in, so that he is surrounded by Liberal Democrat MPs.

His choice of a bread and butter issue ties …

Also posted in News and PMQs | Tagged | 34 Comments

What should Nick ask Gordon at PMQs?

The eyes of the Westminster village will be fixed on the new Lib Dem leader, Nick Clegg, when he pops up tomorrow to put the Prime Minister on the spot. (The eyes of the world will be rather more fixed on the New Hampshire results, of course.)

PMQs is an arena in which previous leaders have tended not to thrive: Paddy, Charles and Ming were not fans of the Commons’ self-indulgent pantomime. However, Vince Cable’s stellar turn as acting leader has certainly raised the bar, and Nick will be well aware that his performance will be directly compared with his …

Also posted in PMQs | 12 Comments

What the public and peers think about the ‘reformed’ House of Lords

Lord Tom McNally, Lib Dem leader in the House of Lords has drawn LDV’s attention to a paper by Dr Meg Russell, a senior research fellow in the Constitution Unit at University College London. Dr Russell has analysed results from the Unit’s public opinion survey on factors influencing the legitimacy of the House of Lords, as well as some figures from their survey of peers.

The briefing which accompanies the paper notes:

The public survey, carried out by Ipsos MORI in late October, asked which factors the public think are important to the legitimacy of the House of Lords. It found:

30 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Margaret
    It's a few years ago now, but I remember having a problem with a car we had hired in Alaska, and having a long argument with a call-handler somewhere in the 'lo...
  • Caracatus
    The thing is we can have lower taxes (for most) and better public services. The madness of the lost war on drugs which cost billions. Sorting social care, th...
  • paul barker
    Can London build its way out of this crisis ? Londons population has gone up by more than half since the 90s & all the "Plans" are for it to go up more. Lo...
  • Steve Nash
    I agree with KP that the International Aid and diplomatic Budget should increased, to challenge both Immigration and the need for Defence. It may not be the ch...
  • Tom Arms
    @ John Kelly: I certainly didn't mean to imply that Gaza is peaceful. Sadly, civilians continue to die, humanitarian conditions remain appalling and Israel cont...