Official: UK voting system “open to fraud”

What has Europe ever done for us? Well, that question was partially answered today: it can expose the Labour Government’s connivance in creating a British electoral system which is open to fraud.

That was the startling conclusion of a report issued today by a committee of the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, which states starkly:

it is clear that the electoral system in Great Britain is open to electoral fraud. This vulnerability is mainly the result of the, rather arcane, system of voter registration without personal identifiers. It was exacerbated by the introduction of postal voting on demand, especially under the arrangements as existed before the changes in the electoral code in 2006. The 2006 changes to the electoral code enhanced the security of the postal voting arrangements, but other shortcomings and vulnerabilities remain. Together with numerous British experts we strongly recommend to eliminate those.

… It should be stressed however, that the United Kingdom delivers democratic elections despite the vulnerabilities in its electoral system. These vulnerabilities could easily affect the overall democratic nature of future elections in Great Britain. The Monitoring Committee should, in its periodic reports on the honouring of commitments by member states, pay special attention to electoral issues in the United Kingdom and, if the vulnerabilities noted are found to undermine the overall democratic nature of future elections in Great Britain, apply to initiate a Monitoring procedure with respect to the United Kingdom.

I called the conclusions ‘startling’ – but, of course, they are not. The Liberal Democrats have been prominent in campaigning for improvements to voter registration, despite the often deaf ears of Labour ministers. The party’s chief executive, Chris Rennard, moved an amendment in the House of Lords in 2006 to help address some of the concerns today’s report has highlighted (you can read his speech here).

What is startling is how unsurprised we all are by the news, and, indeed, how little prominence is being given to it by the news media. Labour’s concern for the integrity of the democratic process is now so casual that this kind of evidence is regarded as little more than background noise.

The Lib Dems’ shadow Justice Secretary, David Heath, is absolutely right:

“We should be deeply ashamed that the United Kingdom, which throughout history has been seen as the cradle of parliamentary democracy, has been found so wanting by our international counterparts. The defects highlighted in the report, such as the fact it is ‘childishly simple’ to register bogus voters, were pointed out in recent legislation. However, the remedies suggested by the Liberal Democrats have been summarily rejected by this Government. For the sake of our democracy and our international reputation, ministers must now deal with the opportunities for abuse.”

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Tapestry, do you stay up late thinking of new ways in which the EU is supposedly meddling in British affairs? It must be very tiresome for you.

  • Hywel Morgan 23rd Jan '08 - 2:18pm

    1 – this report isn’t anything to do with the EU

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Katharine Pindar
    I was too busy singing last night to join in this debate, but having caught up, I'm glad that two-thirds of our 15 MPs aren't recorded as having voted for the m...
  • John Grout
    @Nonconformistradical Pardon? I think you mean David LG!...
  • Ian Shires
    I'm with the 5. Well done them. I gave up smoking many years ago. It was a struggle believe me, but well worth it in health terms. I get the freedom of the ind...
  • Chris Lewcock
    "The freedom to be addicted is no freedom." Hmm. Could be re-formulated to cover any number of current bogeymen? The freedom to be addicted [to driving a car, ...
  • Nick Baird
    On balance I was against this Bill, but I can't get too worked up about it as I think it is virtually unenforceable and will likely be safely ignored by anyone ...