Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Josh Babarinde writes…The Lib Dem Summer of Strategy (Josh Babarinde)
-
Mathew on Monday: “We need to be bold” (Mathew Hulbert)
-
As a party we must be better defined for the 2029 general election (Chris Bowers)
-
From national averages to local realities: inequality in our communities (Tom Walker)
-
We do have a two tier system, Part 2 (Neil Hickman)
Brexit and summer holidays
The pine martens of Shropshire
The shame of Liverpool Labour councillors taking their allowances but not turning up to do the work
Recent Comments
Peter Hirst
I would add caring to bold and relevant. Getting a sympathetic ear at the end of a telephone help line is as important as an extra pound in your pay slip. Under...- Peter Hirst
One of the more important issues that the electorate care about is how much political parties understand what matters to them. This varies from person to person... - Peter Hirst
Inequality must be seen in the round. I appreciate living in the north-west because it gives me easy access to mountains such as in Snowdonia, The Lakes and Der... - Peter Hirst
One of the aims of most societies is some sort of redistribution. So fiscal federalism must have a mechanism for the rich regions giving to the poorer. Without ... 
Peter Martin
The price mechanism is essentially a system of rationing. In wartime it is usually recognised that it isn't the most equitable system! So some better system h...
Readers’ Editor – comments, need it all be so difficult?
The recent decision by ‘Popular Science’, a long-established American magazine, to, for the most part, simply ban comments from the majority of its online content was a dramatic response to the difficulties brought about when you try to maintain a civil discourse on an interactive website such as Liberal Democrat Voice. And if they thought that scientists could be feisty, they have nothing on the politically active.