Mark Pack

Cherie Blair and Princess Margaret

By | Sun 18th May 2008 - 3:42 pm

An extract from her memoirs:

One evening I was at the Royal Opera House for some gala performance and was talking to [Princess Margaret] about what we had seen when Chris Smith came over (the then Minister of Culture, who is gay).

“Have you met Chris Smith, our Culture Secretary, Ma’am?” I asked.

She peered at him.

“And this is his partner,” I added.

“Partner for what?”

I took a breath. “Sex, Ma’am.”

She stalked off.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Mund 18th May '08 - 4:43pm

    Who cares?

  • Peter1919 18th May '08 - 5:04pm

    HeHe, I might have tried to go for something a little more sutbtle like partner in life.

  • Stuart 18th May '08 - 6:24pm

    I am in a gay relationship. There is a little more to it than sex.

  • Mund 18th May '08 - 11:26pm

    Not that any-one cares. (ironic)

  • Pete (the Colchester one) 19th May '08 - 11:57am

    Doesn’t it say volumes on what Cherie Blair’s view of gay relationships really is.

    Princess Margaret would have moved in circles that included many gay people.

    I think this bit of her memoirs shows just what a vulgar person she really is and what her real views of gay people are.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Tim
    @PM. Yes, allowing a LOT more houses to be built would reduce wealth inequality dramatically. We should aim to return to the c1997 price to income ratios - whic...
  • Peter Davies
    and building more houses of course....
  • Peter Davies
    The rising property market contributed more to the impoverishment of the poor than the enrichment of the rich. It is owner occupiers who hold the greatest propo...
  • PM
    @ Tim, You may be technically correct with your argument but it doesn't change the fact that we have become very much more unequal in recent decades. The ...
  • Mick Taylor
    @ColinMurphy. Yes and you could close all the tax loopholes and greatly reduce the huge number of pages in the tax codes that take a highly qualified accountant...