Christine Jardine introduces Bill to give British citizens right to Consular assistance

Back in November, there was not a dry eye in the house when Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe and her husband Richard Ratcliffe spoke to Scottish Lib Dem Conference.

From our piece at the time:

One of the most moving sessions was an interview, hosted by Christine Jardine, with Nazanin Zaghari Ratcliffe and Richard Ratcliffe. Christine said she still has the blue flower Richard gave her when she went to visit him outside the Iranian Embassy when he was on hunger strike during Nazanin’s six year imprisonment in Iran.

Nazanin and Richard want British citizens to have a right to consular protection after the Foreign Office was so slow to help her. At the moment, the commitment is dependent on ministerial whim, and, if ministers are reshuffled, you have to build the relationship up all over again.

Next week, Parliament will debate a Bill tabled by Lib Dem MP Christine designed to give British citizens abroad a right to consular assistance when their human rights are under threat.

Yesterday’s Sunday Post had a feature on the Bill. Christine told the paper:

We assume that if something happens, someone will speak to the Foreign Office and you’re guaranteed assistance – but you’re not.

I think it’s something most of us would take for granted that we already have.

After Richard and I spoke about it, I thought about the number of cases where people have found themselves in that situation over the years.

I thought there needs to be something written down that says if your human rights are under threat in a foreign country, you can have consular support.

Richard Ratcliffe also spoke to the Post:

It’s something we’d been calling for even before Nazanin got home. The system, as it is now, is just unfair. If you make enough noise, you get attention.

We had five foreign secretaries and there have been a couple more since then.

Each time you need to build a new relationship and get your issue into the priority list – which just feels like a really dysfunctional way of doing things.

Imagine with the police if every time there was a change of chief inspector you had to work your way up to get them to take your murder or kidnapping seriously.

It means you end up with this untrusting relationship with the government, where you don’t know what they’re doing and there’s no accountability.

You don’t know what’s going to happen next because you’re not entitled to anything.

It is upsetting to learn that no British citizen has an automatic right to help if they get into trouble abroad rests on the whim of a government minister. Christine’s bill aims to put that right.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Davies
    I don't think we have the construction capacity to engineer a crash in house prices. The highest realistic target would probably only bring prices down by about...
  • Jenny Barnes
    You might remember the story of the inventor, the chessboard and the grains of rice. 1 on the 1st square, 2 on the 2nd, 4 on the 3rd and so on. Things that ca...
  • Jenny Barnes
    World fuel consumption rises by 2%pa, or doubles every 35 years. In any given 35 year period, as much energy is consumed as in the whole preceding history. Rene...
  • PM
    Tim, What would happen to the economy if the price of your Chatham house fell to £70k? There's quite likely someone living there with a mortgage of quite a ...
  • Tim
    @PM. Yes, allowing a LOT more houses to be built would reduce wealth inequality dramatically. We should aim to return to the c1997 price to income ratios - whic...