Clegg on Harry

Liberal Democrat Voice at Conference

On Lib Dem Voice: Reportage | Contribute
On the official party website: Conference home
Watch Live on BBC Parliament

Repsonding to the news of Prince Harry’s race row video – in which he refers to two army friends as a ‘Paki’ and ‘raghead’ – Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg has made clear his dismay:

Mr Clegg added his voice to those criticising Prince Harry’s remarks, saying he would have sacked a member of his team for saying such things. Asked about Prince Harry’s comments, he said: “He should not have used those words, it would have cause considerable offence.” And asked if he would have had to sack a member of his team for using such language, he added: “I would almost certainly have to, yes.” (Source: PoliticHome.com).

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Conference and News.
Advert

9 Comments

  • I agree that the language is totally unacceptable, but who offended the most people: Harry, or the gossip mongers who repeated the same words?
    Responsible reporting (fat chance) would just say that Harry used unacceptably racist language in a home video. Those who use the same offensive words, whether reporting someone else’s comments or not, are equally culpable in my book.
    But what I think is more important is not whether apologies are sufficient, but evidence that the mindset that produced the comments in the first place has changed.
    In the case of Harry, three years is a very long time and is unlikely to reflect the way he thinks now, so what is all the fuss about, except to cause unnecessary offence in order to sell newspapers.
    But I guess that’s what papers like that do…

  • I’m very glad he has condemned the words.

  • Dear Spaghetti Monster, why do we have to put up with this bunch of reactionary parasites (the royals not the press)…

    ’bout time we grew out of all this fawning, forelock-tugging subservience!

    [paddy for prez!]

  • Sorry – the anon is me – for some reason it longer puts up my name automatically and i forgot to enter it…

  • “And asked if he would have had to sack a member of his team for using such language, he added: “I would almost certainly have to, yes.”

    Eexcept when our leader is universally known by his racially based nickname given to him in his Army days?

  • Hywel, never say someone who was a Royal Marine was in the Army.
    Dungeekin has a point there is different mind set in the forces. Still think Harry was a pratt, but you have to make allowances for Guards officers. He has undone all the fine work of his father.

  • “Hywel, never say someone who was a Royal Marine was in the Army.”

    Big Ooooops!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMarco 14th Jul - 4:52pm
    John Marriott depends how you define lockdown - I would say it is legally requiring people to stay at home unless they have a valid...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 14th Jul - 4:51pm
    So we have a Director of Strategy who apparently has no experience of politics. It seems we have learned nothing from the mistakes of the...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 14th Jul - 4:48pm
    Peter Martin, 1. Since the end of the last recession, UK unemployment has more than halved at a time when the total economically-active labour force...
  • User AvatarMarco 14th Jul - 4:46pm
    Paul Walter uses the classic tactic of “I know that but I still think XYZ”. However such tactic does not actually neutralise the argument that...
  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 14th Jul - 4:01pm
    @Glenn If we could reply on people not behaving like this https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/14/video-of-drunken-brits-maskless-in-magaluf-appals-spaniards you might (only might) be able to make a better case.
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 14th Jul - 3:54pm
    @Glenn So, give us the figures. How many countries did NOT perform any form of lockdown? Even your mates in Sweden didn’t indulge in a...