Clegg on Harry

Repsonding to the news of Prince Harry’s race row video – in which he refers to two army friends as a ‘Paki’ and ‘raghead’ – Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg has made clear his dismay:

Mr Clegg added his voice to those criticising Prince Harry’s remarks, saying he would have sacked a member of his team for saying such things. Asked about Prince Harry’s comments, he said: “He should not have used those words, it would have cause considerable offence.” And asked if he would have had to sack a member of his team for using such language, he added: “I would almost certainly have to, yes.” (Source: PoliticHome.com).

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Conference and News.
Advert

9 Comments

  • I agree that the language is totally unacceptable, but who offended the most people: Harry, or the gossip mongers who repeated the same words?
    Responsible reporting (fat chance) would just say that Harry used unacceptably racist language in a home video. Those who use the same offensive words, whether reporting someone else’s comments or not, are equally culpable in my book.
    But what I think is more important is not whether apologies are sufficient, but evidence that the mindset that produced the comments in the first place has changed.
    In the case of Harry, three years is a very long time and is unlikely to reflect the way he thinks now, so what is all the fuss about, except to cause unnecessary offence in order to sell newspapers.
    But I guess that’s what papers like that do…

  • I’m very glad he has condemned the words.

  • Dear Spaghetti Monster, why do we have to put up with this bunch of reactionary parasites (the royals not the press)…

    ’bout time we grew out of all this fawning, forelock-tugging subservience!

    [paddy for prez!]

  • Sorry – the anon is me – for some reason it longer puts up my name automatically and i forgot to enter it…

  • “And asked if he would have had to sack a member of his team for using such language, he added: “I would almost certainly have to, yes.”

    Eexcept when our leader is universally known by his racially based nickname given to him in his Army days?

  • Hywel, never say someone who was a Royal Marine was in the Army.
    Dungeekin has a point there is different mind set in the forces. Still think Harry was a pratt, but you have to make allowances for Guards officers. He has undone all the fine work of his father.

  • “Hywel, never say someone who was a Royal Marine was in the Army.”

    Big Ooooops!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Paul Barker
    Politicians (this means You & me) should keep out of Industrial Relations, they/we should not be backing or attacking strikes. What we should be saying i...
  • George Thomas
    “working with the army and others to put contingency plans in place if these strikes are going to continue” I think the army should change their slogan f...
  • Ruth Bright
    As usual David alerts us to such important issues....
  • David Evans
    Lorenzo, Do you really believe that "Only a general strike, in support of all those who cannot afford to live under the current nightmare economics, makes sens...
  • Jason Connor
    Are they really? Well I'll find out about that to see exactly what is going on. The author would not publish an article if there isn't any truth in it....