Clegg signals control orders to go

In the Hugo Young lecture tonight, Nick Clegg all but said that control orders were to go when – in pre-prepared comments in the middle of the speech – he said:

Old progressives pose a trade-off between individual liberty and national security. But, for liberals, liberty is the guarantor of our security. It is a false trade-off. For old progressives, national priorities will automatically trump individual freedoms. By contrast, the Coalition Government has already halted ID cards, and set out plans to regulate CCTV and end the indefinite storage of innocent people’s DNA. We will also shortly be published the results of our counter-terrorism review.

Voluntarily raising the issue of civil liberties, disdaining the false trade-off between liberty and security – and then leaving hanging at the end of the section the reference to the forthcoming review – combined would not be what someone knowing that control orders may continue would choose to do.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • I have just come back from Nick’s lecture. I’ll wait and see regarding control orders. It may seem to you Mark that Nick threw the dog a bone, but he promised nothing. I did learn that I may be a ‘new progressive’ though. Whatever that means…

  • where does he say that control orders are to go? He says a review will be published shortly but nothing more. What about detention of children……still waiting.

  • I really hope this is true as control orders are simply retention without trail and are unacceptable in my view

  • “What about detention of children……still waiting.”

    There is a fairly extensive pilot scheme underway for a system which only involves detention as an extreme last resort (and then not overnight). That last figure I saw for the number of children in detention for immigration purposes was 0.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Raw 25th Feb - 3:04pm
    @ Frank West It must be very difficult for you, Frank, and you have my sympathy.
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 25th Feb - 2:56pm
    @ Peter Hirst "They are pragmatic though their politicians might not be." Hi, Peter. Having dealt with many of them frequently (Lib Dem, Green, Labour...
  • User AvatarFrank West 25th Feb - 2:45pm
    David Raw, I hover somewhere between anarchy and creative capitalism which often collides with Liberal views but surely after all the angst and anger on...
  • User AvatarPeter Hirst 25th Feb - 2:32pm
    What do the Scottish people really want? I don't suppose there is an easy answer. I suspect they don't want a hard border and they...
  • User AvatarPeter Hayes 25th Feb - 2:21pm
    I do wonder about any government database, not just implementation will be delayed and over budget but security. Any database that knows too much about...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 25th Feb - 2:16pm
    TCO - In your response to @Paul Holmes you say “And no, many Councils do not have suitable smaller accomodation [sic] to offer for tenants...