CommentIsLinked@LDV: Vince Cable – I like optimists, but I don’t buy Mr Darling’s miracle

Over at the Daily Mail, Lib Dem deputy leader Vince Cable delivers his robust verdict on Alistair Darling’s 2009 budget. Here’s an excerpt:

I argued the main requirement was an honest statement, without spin, of the country’s problems. Darling was candid enough about the scale of the budget deficit – which will be a staggering 12 per cent of GDP this year and next, forcing the Government to borrow unprecedented sums to cover the collapse of revenue from financial services and the falling housing market. …

Darling was less honest about the prospects for recovery. He cheerfully assumed growth will return soon. He believes there will be a miracle. I like optimists, but I don’t buy this. I suspect the Treasury engaged in reverse engineering, worked out what growth rate was needed to make the numbers look more respectable and then assumed it.

As a result we haven’t been confronted with the brutal choices which have to be faced over the next decade in public spending. There is a promise of ‘efficiency savings’. But if government is inefficient, why has the inefficiency been tolerated so far? …

The real criticism is that the new top rate [of 50p tax rate on incomes over £150,000] is tokenism. Because there are some enormous loopholes – like capital gains tax at 18 per cent for those who can convert income into stock – the tax won’t be paid. The very rich will wriggle round it. I am very disappointed more effort isn’t being made to lift the income tax burden on low and average earners and pensioners. …

I had a real sense on Wednesday that [this Labour Government was] worn-out and washed-up, overwhelmed by the scale of the crisis which they were too slow to deal with. Mr Osborne grinned like a Cheshire cat at the bad news. The Conservatives assume they can sleepwalk into government. They may be right.

But the challenges are immense and any party aspiring to government (including mine) must face intensive questioning as to what exactly they would do beyond inheriting power by default.

You can read Vince’s article in full HERE.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Hywel
    Paul - what was this. It isn't on the wikipedia page of polls. Not surprised by the lack of commentary - the slow but noticeable down-tick in reform poll rati...
  • paul barker
    A note on Reform, we have just seen the 2nd Poll showing Reform losing their lead. You might think that would attract some notice by Journalists or The Commenta...
  • Peter Chambers
    > Clearly the aircraft carriers were a pork barrel for Gordon Brown’s constituency. Doubtful. More to do with the US "pivot to Asia". The UK does not have...
  • Mark ValladaresMark Valladares
    @ Matt (Bristol), You use the word “vanguardism” as though politicians don’t have an obligation to lead, rather than merely following the loudest voice...
  • Mark Smulian
    I first worked with Michael on his three pamphlets published in the mid-1980s by Liberator and mentioned above by Geoffrey Payne. He was, obviously, an effectv...