Mark Pack

Conservative peer named and shamed over non-payment of tax

By | Thu 7th June 2007 - 2:12 pm

As the BBC says:

A leading Tory donor has been publicly rebuked by the Lords appointments commission for taking his seat without giving up his status as a tax exile … The commission said it had informed the prime minister of Lord Laidlaw’s situation and said it would not have approved his peerage if it had known that he would not honour his promise.

In other words – he promised to pay tax if he got his peerage, he’s got his peerage and, er… he’s not paying the tax he promised.

And here’s a fun twist for those who have been following the attempts of Conservative and Labour MPs to exempt Parliament from the Freedom of Information Act  – it’s under that very act that the rest of us get to read the following letter written to Lord Laidlaw by the Chairman of the Appointments Commission:

You made a very precise commitment to the commission in a situation where you knew a condition of being appointed to the Lords was to be UK tax resident. You have so far failed to honour this unqualified commitment.

And the reason Lord Laidlaw hasn’t had the Conservative whip withdrawn for breaking his promise and failing to pay the tax is …?

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Michael BG
    Paul Baker, The £16,000 limit on total savings for those of working age on benefits hasn’t been changed since 2013. If someone has more savings than this ...
  • Rose Runswick
    I appreciate the concerns here that we are not in the running for this Seat currently, but this has not always been the case, at one stage we were the main chal...
  • Tim Rogers
    I agree. We are not in the running for this seat. However we must hope that Green party do not win. Next year's local elections are going to be truly massive an...
  • Mohammed Amin
    I would not put any national resources into this by election. It looks extremely unpromising, as it will clearly be a two horse race between Labour and Greens. ...
  • Katharine Pindar
    What can be seen as 'progressive' new taxation, for Andy Burnham and his Chancellor to try in order to raise further much-needed funds? Not surely by any means ...