Consultation on the link between the Co-op and Labour

My other half and I are lucky enough to live a couple of minutes walk from a decent sized Co-op store. It’s convenient, has some fairtrade, and we get a few vouchers through being members. The downside is that we seem to be supporting the Labour party when we have no wish to. The Co-op supports Labour candidates to the tune of £800,000 a year apparently. The Conservative MP Jesse Norman claimed that the Co-operative group has in the last ten years “given £6,187,788 to the Co-operative Party, and a further £355,857 to the Labour Party”.

It’s a bit of a shame because, like many Lib Dems, I quite like the idea of co-ops and mutuals. As is the case with unions, I wonder how many of the 7.2 million members really are supporters of the Labour party. In theory you could stand for election to one of the Co-op’s area committees, but, as pointed out elsewhere, changing the Co-op is likely to be a long uphill struggle and who has the time?

Well, there is an easier way. The Co-op is currently running a survey, which should only take twenty minutes. About half way in they ask some pertinent questions about the political/financial link between the Co-op and Labour. They first ask if people were aware of the link, and then ask whether they agree with statements about the relationship. Interestingly, it looks like the options are stacked slightly against the link (although you can strongly disagree with options of course), the strongest anti-option being ‘It is inappropriate for the Co-operative to give financial support to a political party’. The survey is open to members and non-members here.

* Tad Jones is a Liberal Democrat member in Nottingham and a member of ALDES. He writes in a personal capacity.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

18 Comments

  • peter tyzack 21st Feb '14 - 5:07pm

    Labour are in a coalition with the Coop Party, with the Coop not being atall distinct and separate as you might think. If you stand as a Coop candidate you have to commit to taking the Labour whip if elected.. so their support for the Coop Party is in reality support for a Labour-Coop Alliance Party… and as Tad Jones says, I wonder how many shoppers realise that there is any connection between the Coop and politics.
    Though having said that, does anyone have any idea just how much money is being shovelled by all the supermarkets into one or other political party, and I don’t just mean sponsoring receptions at party conferences…??

  • Stuart Mitchell 21st Feb '14 - 5:39pm

    I suspect the proportion of Co-op customers who realise the Co-op is in some way linked to Labour is much higher than the proportion, say, of patients in C&C Alpha hospitals and care homes who realise that they are helping to support the Lib Dems :-

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/rolls-royce-bribery-probe-millionaire-3143682

    To be honest I’m genuinely puzzled by the way people who call themselves “democrats” should take it upon themselves to actively campaign to remove sources of funding from political opponents.

  • I assume you’d support public referendums on all donors to any party or politician on whether they’d be allowed to donate?

    Just to prove this isn’t an organised attempt to manipulate a poll so as to defund your opponents, because that would be an astonishingly small minded thing to do.

  • @g

    “Just to prove this isn’t an organised attempt to manipulate a poll so as to defund your opponents”

    Yes, poor little Labour party being bullied by those nasty, big rich Lib Dems, eh?

  • Richard Harris 22nd Feb '14 - 6:46am

    The co-ops support is open and public. Other businesses are free to support political parties and do. You have a democratic right not to shop in the co-op. What’s the problem?

  • Alisdair McGregor 22nd Feb '14 - 7:42am

    My problem is that I rather like the idea of co-ops, but the co-op party has become an ineffective pressure group within Labour that does nothing for co-operatives.

    Even when the Prime Minister was a co-operative party member, they achieved little or nothing to promote co-operatives in general (as opposed to the co-operative group, which is a different thing altogether).

    The Liberal Democrats should be the party of mutualism; the Labour Party isn’t & can’t be.

  • Paula Keaveney 22nd Feb '14 - 8:26am

    I’ve just filled in the survey. Clearly the Co Operative group has a huge reputation issue to address and this is part of it – kudos to them for doing this and for advertising it so widely. However what disappointed me about the form ( I am a member and pay reasonably close attention to things) is that there was no real opportunity to voice opinions about the operation of the group in my area. Where I live the group closed a food store in a deprived area and as far as I can see there was minimal or no consultation. When I contacted a member of the local committee I was told the decision hadn’t come near them (I believe him on that but it sort of begs the question of why have the local committees). Now we have an empty building and the only bits of news from the group about what will happen to the building are vague to the point of meaninglessness. Obviously this is a very local example but if an organisation wants to be seen as community minded and ethical it needs to do better than this. I tried to shoehorn these views into the question about what they could do to persuade more shoppers to shop with them (by not doing this was my answer!). It will be interesting to see what comes out of this consultation. I see some Labour members are already calling for to be closed now!

  • Eddie Sammon 22nd Feb '14 - 8:40am

    Alisdair, can you explain to me how being the party of mutuals would not be extremely left wing? Should all profit be shared between workers evenly? If not then it is not a true co-operative. The co-op is anything but a mutual nowadays.

  • Michael Main 22nd Feb '14 - 8:48am

    As a former member of a Regional Board and an Area Committee, as well as being on the Main Board of Co-operatives UK,I never made any secret of the fact that I was a Lib Dem. Many of the members of the committees were and are Labour Party supporters and it will be an uphill struggle to change this. The decision to donate money to the Co-operative Party is usually made at the AGM which takes place in May in Manchester. Ordinary members are not allowed to attend this – only delegates from the elected committees. I argued for this to be changed but received little or no support. After all BT with more than a million shareholders, has the AGM open to all.
    I would strongly urge all LibDems to take an active interest in their local Co-operatives, certainly fill in the survey and even stand for election.
    I have always felt strongly that we need a healthy alternative to the four big chains who really only profit shareholders and do little for the local areas in which they trade. I would add that many suppliers as well need this alternative outlet otherwise they could easily be browbeaten by the likes of M&S (see recent stories)

  • Stuart Mitchell 22nd Feb '14 - 9:28am

    @RC
    “Yes, poor little Labour party being bullied by those nasty, big rich Lib Dems, eh?”

    I think you need to take a look at some of the people who finance the Lib Dems before you try taking the moral high ground.

    See link in my earlier post.

  • RC, on another thread you told me the lib dems should not give back money derived from crime and donated by criminals, yet here you are arguing that Labour should be deprived of a legitimate funding source given in the expectation that low paid workers will be supported.

  • Richard Harris
    If the Co-op is the only store in town you do not have a choice unless you can travel to another town. I too like the idea of the Co-op but it seems to have been mismanaged for many years, falling from 50% of the retail trade in 1950 to about 5% now, whereas the John Lewis partnership is doing very well. The Co-op should be run by professional management and the activities of the elected board confined to an advisory role without any power to overrule the directors on business matters. If the ability of the Labour Party to run the country is judged on the success or otherwise of the Co-op or the many agencies run by Labour supporters they do not seem to have done very well.

    At least their prices, compared with other supermarkets seem to have come down a bit recently, bu maybe the new boss was worried they would lose all their customers if they did not do something. He seems to have some idea what he is doing.

  • The results of the survey have been published.
    http://www.haveyoursay.coop/

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • John Grout
    The link to book a place is here, incidentally - https://events.libdems.org.uk/events/64882/newbies-pint-2024...
  • Cassie
    @James: The % growth in state pension has conspicuously exceeded that of public sector incomes... The size of a percentage increase is meaningless unless you...
  • Peter Hirst
    Not being an economist funds for public services can only be obtained from exporting goods and services. Reducing waiting lists must be one of the core issues w...
  • Peter Hirst
    I might be forgiven for thinking the sole purpose of the previous government's tenure was to enrich their supporters and ensure their future success. Labour mus...
  • Joe Bourke
    Peter Martin, when Henry George was writing there was no US federal income tax. The Federal government financed its spending largerly from customs and excise...