Daily Mirror: ‘Time for Plan V’ (aka ‘Vince for Chancellor’)

The front page of this morning’s Mirror newspaper may bring a smile to the face even of that most sober of politicians, Vince Cable:

The reality is of course that there’s next-to-no chance that David Cameron will reshuffle his long-standing political friend from the Treasury — and, even if he did, the Tory party would demand he be replaced with one of their own (eg, William Hague or Phillip Hammond).

A YouGov poll showed this week that Vince would be the most popular choice as Chancellor if George Osborne were to be moved, though more so among Lib Dem (39%) and Labour (32%) voters than Tory voters (13% — Hague was their preferred alternative).

If this were a rational world, there’s no doubt Vince would be a shoo-in for the Chancellorship. As the Independent’s Matthew Norman pointedly asked earlier this month, ‘How often does Vince Cable have to be right before they make him Chancellor?’

But this isn’t a rational world. In fact, the scenario in which Vince becomes Lib Dem leader is far more plausible (as Steve Richards observed this week) — even though it’s the job to which he’s far less suited, with his tendency to wrong-foot colleagues with surprise announcements (mansion tax, tuition fees).

* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from 2007 to 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Sadly, this will not be an option as the largest partner will always warrant control of the most important Cabinet post. Perhaps a more realistic option would be Ken Clarke ?

    He has the experience, is not on the hang ’em flog ’em wing of the Tories and may be seen as a safe pair of hands.

    Of course our current PM will not sanction a move based upon the needs of the Country and his pal George will keep plodding on…

  • Tony Dawson 26th Jul '12 - 9:41am

    So there’s Dave C, tucking into his 6 am bowl of Shreddies and he turns to Samantha, saying:

    “Cripes, Sam, there was I wondering what to do about the country and here it is staring me in the face from the Daily Mirror. Why on earth didn’t I think of that myself, all along? You would have thought Nick would have suggested it, wouldn’t you? ” 🙂

  • The economy will get a lot worse before we have a “night of the long silver spoons”.

    Cameron is world class at fiddling while Rome burns – we saw it last summer with the riots.

  • James Hardy 26th Jul '12 - 1:07pm

    If that were to happen, we’d be annihilated at the election. I don’t care how good Vince Cable is, no way he could get Britain back in the black in two an a half years, and then both Labour and the Tories would both blame the Lib-Dems for the economic problems. It would be the ultimate poisoned chalice

  • Richard Dean 26th Jul '12 - 1:22pm

    I agree with James Hardy. Vince was confident and happy to accept compliments last night – because he knows he’ll never be tested.

  • I agree with the comments from James Hardy and Richard Dean. It’s great to be getting so much exposure for Vince , and all the compliments about how he is the answer to the current lack of competence. Thankfully this won’t happen as it would be a poisened chalice. But this way, we can distance ourselves from the Tories at the election, by saying how much better it would have been if only we’d had Vince Cable as Chancellor.

  • Couldn’t agree less with the last two comments which would apply to Cable were he to take over the leadership rather than the Exchequer. He’s also well on the way to re-establishing his reputation (badly damaged after tuition fees) as one of the Government’s very few competent ministers.
    As the YouGov Poll shows, a large majority of the public simply do not like George Osborne. In my opinion he is far more dangerous to the LibDems as Conservative Party strategist so in purely political terms he should be allowed to stay with his ‘Plan A’ so Vince can continue to hint at ‘Plan A+’ . Cameron and Osborne are joined at the hip so the PM’s future could be vulnerable if his friend’s 2010 spending review were to be seen by a majority of the apparently ever enduring 30% of Tory hardcore voters as a catastrophic error of judgement.
    Judging by this Poll, that could happen within the coming year: just around the time Brooks and Coulson take the spotlight and shine it on Downing Steet.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 20th Oct - 11:50pm
    Paul and David, at it again, getting me at it too , with much thanks ! A remarkable story , the unplanned speech, don,t ever...
  • User Avatarfrankie 20th Oct - 10:36pm
    Sheila, Time ticks on and everyday the leave case is shot to pieces. As reality bites the only thing that seems to be keeping Leavers...
  • User Avatarfrankie 20th Oct - 10:23pm
    Clegg came from a political bubble with limited inter action with normal people. He also seems to have fallen into a trap one of my...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 20th Oct - 10:19pm
    Well said, David! Long may you continue act as usefully as you do. Michael, thank you for pointing out what was already known about Palehorse...
  • User AvatarPeter Hayes 20th Oct - 9:28pm
    As my parents are both dead it is probably safe to say they remember me saying "let Daddy smack me" as an an alternative to...
  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 20th Oct - 8:32pm
    Just so long as we are not going to go down the Norwegian route. There are, I am afraid, much worse forms of child abuse...