Dan Rogerson MP

Dan Rogerson MP writes… Welcoming more transparent school performance data

By | Mon 30th January 2012 - 10:54 am

Performance data for secondary schools was published last week, and there is an important difference between the latest figures and those that have been published in previous years. For the first time we are publishing separately the GCSE achievements of looked after children and children on free school meals at each and every school – the same group of young people who are eligible for the Pupil Premium.

With the Pupil Premium, funding is being specifically targeted at disadvantaged pupils, so that schools have the resources they need to make a difference. The new information will give us the opportunity to see the effect the Pupil Premium will have on the lives of those pupils that were routinely overlooked by the previous government: those from the poorest and most vulnerable backgrounds.

There are various reasons why these performance tables needed to be reformed. Under Labour, the way these tables were managed led to a perverse incentive for schools to concentrate solely on those students expected to achieve just above or just below a “C” grade. Schools were forced to desperately try and improve the fortunes of this narrow band of students in order to improve the overall performance of the school in the league tables.

For too long, pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds didn’t receive the support they needed. The new information will give us the opportunity to see for ourselves the positive impact the Pupil Premium has had on those pupils who need the most help.

Dan Rogerson is Co-Chair of the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Party Committee on Education, Families and Young People and MP for North Cornwall.

* Dan Rogerson is the Liberal Democrat MP for North Cornwall.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Redndead 30th Jan '12 - 11:55am

    Leaving aside the pupil premium, it’s a shame these tables do not include the £ per pupil each LEA receives, so we can see whether there is any correlation between amount spent and results.

    There is such a vast disparity in funding between LEAs that variations in outcomes are hardly surprising.

    The thing I find really astonishing is that , based pn the value added scores, so few secondary schools appear to improve on their pupils expected outcomes and in most cases pupils suffer a reverse

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Meg Thomas
    We need to be very fearful of unbridled capitalism. I think it has fuelled inequality and been very damaging. Some people in this thread seem like libertarians...
  • Kira Collins
    @Peter Martin “ In 2024/25, the Barnett block grant amounted to £45bn in Scotland, £20bn in Wales and £18bn in N.Ireland. I would term these payments as f...
  • expats
    @theakes 8th Jun '26 - 12:20pm... We simple have to accept there will always be a level of inequality, it is in the human psyche.... Most families DON'T have...
  • Peter Davies
    @Peter Wrigley: You will be glad to know that the wealth ratio between the richest and poorest is already much lower than 10:1. It is in fact negative. There wi...
  • Nigel Jones
    @Mick Taylor, I agree we must be concerned about income inequality in current circumstances, though overcoming this is about taxing the rich, better public serv...