Censoring social media during riots: good news, mostly

Talking to Liberal Democrats in Whitehall about Cameron’s misguided talk of social media bans during riots, the reactions range from the bluntly oppositional to the intriguing repeated suggestion that Cameron himself misspoke and didn’t really mean to suggest anything more than looking at how the police can best use existing laws.

So far, so good.

The one caveat to watch out for is that in other areas Conservative ministers such as Ed Vaizey have shown a strong liking for self-regulation by industry. Applied to social media and riots, this could see attempts to encourage the industry to agree sweeping procedures with the police that require no votes in Parliaments. Unlike the hotly contested area of online piracy, website blocking and traffic throttling – where some in the industry are keen to strike such deals – there is far less enthusiasm for such an approach amongst social networking firms themselves. Even so, it’s one to watch.

And whilst watching … here is a petition you can sign.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • As a liberal I’m fundamentally opposed to governments sticking there noses into private conversation between individuals over the phone, online or over the garden fence. It may be a useful tool in crime prevention, but it is also a gross invasion of privacy. In cases where no crime has been committed it has, in the past. led to the persecution and failed prosecution of people who’s only crime is to say stupid things to each other in private conversations.
    It is also increasingly obvious that these riots were not well organised criminal acts and that the role off the social media mostly amounted to people saying injudicious things. For every looter that contacted another looter there will be literally thousands of conversations involving one over excited person contacting another.. Ultimately you can only prosecute people who have actually done something wrong, otherwise you get into the dangerous area of pre-crime knee-jerk over-reaction and spying..

  • I agree with the previous to posters although i am not sure if you can really say that outside of direct messaging Twiter is a private conversation. After all you want your followers to read your tweets so it is more like exhibitionist conversation.

  • Jedibeeftrix
    You’re right. but I used the the lower case L because I wasn’t being party loyal. There are liberal Tory andLlabour supporters. And party members for that matter.
    Simon.
    I never thought of that. But you’re right and it does have a baring on a very recent conviction that makes me very uncomfortable.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • James Fowler
    The real fall out from this budget is the incipient 'mortgage crisis'. Coming on the heels of energy, inflation, lockdown and Brexit crises we're getting punch ...
  • George Thomas
    Didn't the Tories (as part of coalition) cut top rate of tax from 50% to 45% during middle of need to raise money/in wider world of economic crisis? Coalition o...
  • Steven
    I agree Jason Connor. Those electors who want PR can't really trust Labour to deliver upon it. I would want a manifesto pledge to be written in blood before I b...
  • Steven
    On the United Kingdom mainland only Scotland's Holyrood and the London Assembly can be described as being described as being proper, full examples of Proportion...
  • Steven
    Unfortunately, FPTP single member constituencies produce such huge levels of disproportionality of election results that in mixed PR AMS systems you need to hav...