The article which appeared here has been removed. Comment is free. Facts are sacred. There were factual inaccuracies in that piece which were pointed out in the comments and we have therefore decided that its removal is appropriate.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
William Wallace writes: The case for higher taxes (Lord William Wallace)
-
“I’ve worked with Andy Burnham. There is much to look forward to” (NewsHound)
-
Mathew on Monday: Ann Widdecombe, robust debate and the need to disagree agreeably (Mathew Hulbert)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Observations of an Expat: Visions of America (Tom Arms)
-
Val Doonican: Elusive Butterfly
-
The Joy of Six 1548
-
Reform adopt the Trump agenda on elections
-
What would have happened if St Pancras station had been closed?
-
Ben Maguire welcomes dissolution of multi-academy trust over discipline concerns
-
Rhodri Morgan statue unveiled in Cardiff
-
The Wealth Tax is a Progressive Fallacy
-
The Conservatives are embarking on another purge
-
Why don't people use trains more?
-
Are Plaid Cymru serious about government?
Recent Comments
William Wallace
Jana: Investing in strong research and development in key sectors (which is where China is soaring ahead), rebuilding training, apprenticeships and early edu...
Russell
By committing to not raising the 3 main taxes but then raising taxes by over £70bn on stupid taxes Labour have done a lot of unnecessary damage to the UK econo...
Jana
“ …the hard choices required to revive our economy and strengthen our security.” If by hard choices you mean increasing taxes, I agree that that may be...
Paul Walter
Peter, please see my ample answers above. I have made it perfectly clear what I believe. Best wishes, Paul...
Peter Martin
@ Paul, I accept you are agreeing to an extent. A limited extent. "There are ample legal mechanisms for ensuring that the financial settlement with t...
